Prev: [116/116] GFS2: Skip check for mandatory locks when unlocking
Next: [033/156] mqueue: fix mq_open() file descriptor leak on user-space processes
From: Greg KH on 30 Mar 2010 20:00 2.6.33-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. ------------------ From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs(a)cn.fujitsu.com> commit 52fbe9cde7fdb5c6fac196d7ebd2d92d05ef3cd4 upstream. The ring buffer resizing and resetting relies on a schedule RCU action. The buffers are disabled, a synchronize_sched() is called and then the resize or reset takes place. But this only works if the disabling of the buffers are within the preempt disabled section, otherwise a window exists that the buffers can be written to while a reset or resize takes place. Reported-by: Li Zefan <lizf(a)cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs(a)cn.fujitsu.com> LKML-Reference: <4B949E43.2010906(a)cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt(a)goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)suse.de> --- kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c @@ -2232,12 +2232,12 @@ ring_buffer_lock_reserve(struct ring_buf if (ring_buffer_flags != RB_BUFFERS_ON) return NULL; - if (atomic_read(&buffer->record_disabled)) - return NULL; - /* If we are tracing schedule, we don't want to recurse */ resched = ftrace_preempt_disable(); + if (atomic_read(&buffer->record_disabled)) + goto out_nocheck; + if (trace_recursive_lock()) goto out_nocheck; @@ -2469,11 +2469,11 @@ int ring_buffer_write(struct ring_buffer if (ring_buffer_flags != RB_BUFFERS_ON) return -EBUSY; - if (atomic_read(&buffer->record_disabled)) - return -EBUSY; - resched = ftrace_preempt_disable(); + if (atomic_read(&buffer->record_disabled)) + goto out; + cpu = raw_smp_processor_id(); if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, buffer->cpumask)) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |