Prev: [patch 052/164] PCI quirk: Disable MSI on VIA K8T890 systems
Next: [090/200] x86/amd-iommu: Fix crash when request_mem_region fails
From: Greg KH on 1 Jul 2010 17:20 2.6.34-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Tony Breeds <tony(a)bakeyournoodle.com> commit fd6be105b883244127a734ac9f14ae94a022dcc0 upstream. Currently, we can hit a nasty case with optimistic spinning on mutexes: CPU A tries to take a mutex, while holding the BKL CPU B tried to take the BLK while holding the mutex This looks like a AB-BA scenario but in practice, is allowed and happens due to the auto-release on schedule() nature of the BKL. In that case, the optimistic spinning code can get us into a situation where instead of going to sleep, A will spin waiting for B who is spinning waiting for A, and the only way out of that loop is the need_resched() test in mutex_spin_on_owner(). This patch fixes it by completely disabling spinning if we own the BKL. This adds one more detail to the extensive list of reasons why it's a bad idea for kernel code to be holding the BKL. Signed-off-by: Tony Breeds <tony(a)bakeyournoodle.com> Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds(a)linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra(a)chello.nl> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh(a)kernel.crashing.org> LKML-Reference: <20100519054636.GC12389(a)ozlabs.org> [ added an unlikely() attribute to the branch ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo(a)elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)suse.de> --- kernel/mutex.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) --- a/kernel/mutex.c +++ b/kernel/mutex.c @@ -172,6 +172,13 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, struct thread_info *owner; /* + * If we own the BKL, then don't spin. The owner of + * the mutex might be waiting on us to release the BKL. + */ + if (unlikely(current->lock_depth >= 0)) + break; + + /* * If there's an owner, wait for it to either * release the lock or go to sleep. */ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |