From: Greg KH on
2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng(a)redhat.com>

commit c084ca704a3661bf77690a05bc6bd2c305d87c34 upstream.

commit 8bd108d adds preemption point after each opcode parse, then
a sleeping function called from invalid context bug was founded
during suspend/resume stage. this was fixed in commit abe1dfa by
don't cond_resched when irq_disabled. But recent commit 138d156 changes
the behaviour to don't cond_resched when in_atomic. This makes the
sleeping function called from invalid context bug happen again, which
is reported in http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/1/371.

This patch also fixes http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14483

Reported-and-bisected-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger(a)lwfinger.net>
Reported-and-bisected-by: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock(a)gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng(a)redhat.com>
Acked-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy(a)suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown(a)intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)suse.de>

---
include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
+++ b/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static inline void *acpi_os_acquire_obje
#include <linux/hardirq.h>
#define ACPI_PREEMPTION_POINT() \
do { \
- if (!in_atomic_preempt_off()) \
+ if (!in_atomic_preempt_off() && !irqs_disabled()) \
cond_resched(); \
} while (0)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/