Prev: [040/165] ipvs: Add missing locking during connection table hashing and unhashing
Next: [002/165] ssb: Handle Netbook devices where the SPROM address is changed
From: Greg KH on 30 Jul 2010 13:20 2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. ------------------ commit 515f41c33a9d44a964264c9511ad2c869af1fac3 upstream (as of v2.6.33-rc3) This fixes a bug (found by Curt Wohlgemuth) in which new blocks returned from an extent created with ext4_ext_zeroout() can have dirty metadata still associated with them. Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso(a)mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)suse.de> --- fs/ext4/extents.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c @@ -3029,6 +3029,14 @@ out: return err; } +static void unmap_underlying_metadata_blocks(struct block_device *bdev, + sector_t block, int count) +{ + int i; + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) + unmap_underlying_metadata(bdev, block + i); +} + static int ext4_ext_handle_uninitialized_extents(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t iblock, unsigned int max_blocks, @@ -3104,6 +3112,18 @@ out: } else allocated = ret; set_buffer_new(bh_result); + /* + * if we allocated more blocks than requested + * we need to make sure we unmap the extra block + * allocated. The actual needed block will get + * unmapped later when we find the buffer_head marked + * new. + */ + if (allocated > max_blocks) { + unmap_underlying_metadata_blocks(inode->i_sb->s_bdev, + newblock + max_blocks, + allocated - max_blocks); + } map_out: set_buffer_mapped(bh_result); out1: -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |