Prev: Can one set one's own password for root?
Next: Is it possible to add a shortcut entry in the top level innautilus
From: David W. Hodgins on 26 Mar 2010 14:48 On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:33:15 -0400, RodMcKay <NoJunkMail(a)no.com> wrote: > What does anyone here think re virtualizing via open source > VirtualBox? Keep in mind, that there are two different versions of VirtualBox. There is the open source edition, that is provided by many distributions, using a package manager, and there is a proprietary version, which you have to download from http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads As far as I know, the only difference is related to usb support, which is much better in the proprietary version. This is one of the few packages where I recommend using the third party version, rather then the version provided by the distribution you choose to use. Regards, Dave Hodgins -- Change nomail.afraid.org to ody.ca to reply by email. (nomail.afraid.org has been set up specifically for use in usenet. Feel free to use it yourself.)
From: J.O. Aho on 26 Mar 2010 15:06
RodMcKay wrote: > On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:23:44 +0100, Aragorn > <aragorn(a)chatfactory.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sunday 03 January 2010 19:17 in alt.os.linux, somebody identifying as >> RodMcKay wrote... >> > > [snip] > >> I'm not sure what you mean by "a hierarchical text editor", but just >> about every GNU/Linux distribution comes loaded with editors of all >> kinds, both for character mode and GUI mode. Kate/Kwrite (part of KDE) >> is very good, but if you want al the bells and whistles then you could >> try Xemacs. > > Yup but they're regular text editors, not hierarchical. Xemacs may be > tabbed, but it's not hierarchical from the looks of it where tabs > exist within an _individual_ file and various sub-categories can be > included in that one file. FreeMind, maepad, rwdhypernote, HIDAM. -- //Aho |