From: Greg KH on 30 Jul 2010 13:50 2.6.33-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. ------------------ This patch moves handling of the MC vmexits to an earlier point in the vmexit. The handle_exit function is too late because the vcpu might alreadry have changed its physical cpu. Cc: stable(a)kernel.org Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi(a)redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit fe5913e4e1700cbfc337f4b1da9ddb26f6a55586) --- arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c @@ -1255,7 +1255,7 @@ static int nm_interception(struct vcpu_s return 1; } -static int mc_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm) +static void svm_handle_mce(struct vcpu_svm *svm) { /* * On an #MC intercept the MCE handler is not called automatically in @@ -1265,6 +1265,11 @@ static int mc_interception(struct vcpu_s "int $0x12\n"); /* not sure if we ever come back to this point */ + return; +} + +static int mc_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm) +{ return 1; } @@ -2820,6 +2825,14 @@ static void svm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu vcpu->arch.regs_avail &= ~(1 << VCPU_EXREG_PDPTR); vcpu->arch.regs_dirty &= ~(1 << VCPU_EXREG_PDPTR); } + + /* + * We need to handle MC intercepts here before the vcpu has a chance to + * change the physical cpu + */ + if (unlikely(svm->vmcb->control.exit_code == + SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + MC_VECTOR)) + svm_handle_mce(svm); } #undef R -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|
Pages: 1 Prev: [128/140] 3c503: Fix IRQ probing Next: [089/205] sched: Fix over-scheduling bug |