11th suicide at Apple factory
in [Computers]
|
Prev: Former Australian prime minister Malcolm Fraser has quit Right wing party , wonder WHY ??
Next: Rsvp single moms lookin for love, that is, luvvv
From: Rod Speed on 30 May 2010 01:02 Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF " <""does.tholen.have.many.kook.outs\"@kangarooistan.com.au . wrote: > Rod Speed wrote: >> Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF " >> <"does.tholen.have.many.kook.outs(a)kangarooistan.com.au . wrote: >>> Marts wrote: >>>> Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF wrote... >>>> >>>>>>>> So it aint just Apple, fool. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Never said it was, fool. >>>>>> >>>>>> Obvious lie with the subject line, fuckwit. >>>>> >>>>> You never ever could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag. >>>> >>>> Sir John (or whoever you are), there's a saying, "never argue with >>>> an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level, then beat you with >>>> experience." >>> >>> Marts, or whoever you are, I am well aware of that expression. There >>> are many fools in politics. >>> >>>> He posts a line that is a direct reference to the OP (you) about >>>> being a fool and other comments directed at you, then realises that >>>> the hole that he's in, again, is far too deep for him to do >>>> anything but to continue digging. >>> >>> I am well aware of Roddles' inept arguing techniques. >>> >>>> But then, perhaps he "thinks" that we mean that he's refering to >>>> the original author of the news article and those being >>>> interviewed in it. Maybe he expects that they'll be reading his >>>> posts (he can be quite delusional at times, you know), therefore >>>> the direct attribution. >>> >>> Yes, it does appear that way sometimes. >>> >>>> Either that, or he's plain illiterate and can neither read, nor >>>> write. Certainly that explanation full of gibberish about the >>>> invalidity of Speedtest network performance testing bears that out. >>> >>> LOL! Funny you should bring that up. Its at this point where he >>> usually cuts and runs. >> >> In fact it was you that did that yourself you pathetic excuse for a >> bullshit artist. > > You never ever could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag. And just did it again.
From: Rod Speed on 30 May 2010 05:26
Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF " <""does.tholen.have.many.kook.outs\"@kangarooistan.com.au . wrote: > Rod Speed wrote: >> Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF " >> <"does.tholen.have.many.kook.outs(a)kangarooistan.com.au . wrote: >>> Rod Speed wrote: >>>> Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF " >>>> <"does.tholen.have.many.kook.outs(a)kangarooistan.com.au . wrote: >>>>> Marts wrote: >>>>>> Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF wrote... >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So it aint just Apple, fool. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Never said it was, fool. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Obvious lie with the subject line, fuckwit. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You never ever could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sir John (or whoever you are), there's a saying, "never argue >>>>>> with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level, then beat you >>>>>> with experience." >>>>> >>>>> Marts, or whoever you are, I am well aware of that expression. >>>>> There are many fools in politics. >>>>> >>>>>> He posts a line that is a direct reference to the OP (you) about >>>>>> being a fool and other comments directed at you, then realises >>>>>> that the hole that he's in, again, is far too deep for him to do >>>>>> anything but to continue digging. >>>>> >>>>> I am well aware of Roddles' inept arguing techniques. >>>>> >>>>>> But then, perhaps he "thinks" that we mean that he's refering to >>>>>> the original author of the news article and those being >>>>>> interviewed in it. Maybe he expects that they'll be reading his >>>>>> posts (he can be quite delusional at times, you know), therefore >>>>>> the direct attribution. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, it does appear that way sometimes. >>>>> >>>>>> Either that, or he's plain illiterate and can neither read, nor >>>>>> write. Certainly that explanation full of gibberish about the >>>>>> invalidity of Speedtest network performance testing bears that >>>>>> out. >>>>> >>>>> LOL! Funny you should bring that up. Its at this point where he >>>>> usually cuts and runs. >>>> >>>> In fact it was you that did that yourself you pathetic excuse for a >>>> bullshit artist. >>> >>> You never ever could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag. >> And just did it again. > Admission noted. You never ever could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag. |