120hz versus 240hz
in [Repair]
|
Prev: mp3 player will not play songs
Next: Gale turntable
From: William Sommerwerck on 26 Feb 2010 13:15 >> ** And if you put the remark back into its context -- >> what it IS relevant to becomes obvious. > No it doesn't. Agreed. It seemed unrelated, even out of left field. I suspect Sylvia didn't properly express what she wanted to say.
From: William Sommerwerck on 26 Feb 2010 13:20 > I don't know how a 240Hz "scan rate" would be achieved. > It's probably a sort of trick that the set's electronics use > to make the picture seem just that much more stable. Actually, it's a frame rate. It can be done by interpolation, by inserting blank frames, or a combination of the two.
From: AZ Nomad on 26 Feb 2010 13:29 On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:20:29 -0800, William Sommerwerck <grizzledgeezer(a)comcast.net> wrote: >> I don't know how a 240Hz "scan rate" would be achieved. >> It's probably a sort of trick that the set's electronics use >> to make the picture seem just that much more stable. >Actually, it's a frame rate. It can be done by interpolation, by inserting >blank frames, or a combination of the two. or perhaps it's just a flash rate, the pulses powering the LED backlight
From: David Nebenzahl on 26 Feb 2010 13:39 On 2/26/2010 8:46 AM Meat Plow spake thus: > On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:47:16 -0800, "William Sommerwerck" > <grizzledgeezer(a)comcast.net>wrote: > >>> Ignoring the fact that colour displays are finely tuned >>> to the way that human colour vision works, and an alien >>> would likely wonder what we'd been smoking. >> >> This has nothing whatever to do with color rendition. >> >> Who is Sylvia, anyway? > > A troll? Why would you jump to that conclusion? Oh, forgot; that's what you do. -- You were wrong, and I'm man enough to admit it. - a Usenet "apology"
From: Leonard Caillouet on 26 Feb 2010 14:12
"Phil Allison" <phil_a(a)tpg.com.au> wrote in message news:7uoqa3Fit1U1(a)mid.individual.net... > > "Arfa Daily" >> "Phil Allison" >>> "William Sommerwanker IDIOT " >>> >>>> First, the only televisions that use LEDs use OLEDs. There are none >>>> using >>>> conventional LEDs. >>> >>> >>> ** Fraid " LED TVs " are on sale all over the world right now. >>> >>> FUCKWIT !! >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LED-backlit_LCD_television >>> >>> >> >> Your Wiki reference says it all. These are NOT LED televisions, > > ** But they are called " LED TVs " by their makers and so are > > *KNOWN BY THAT NAME* to members of the public. > > > Fools like YOU and Sommerwanker would complain that a bottle of "Steak > Sauce" contained no steak. > > > > .... Phil I guess we should refer to all LCD sets by their backlight type. That makes the one on my wall a CCFL TV. And I guess all of those DLP, LCD, DiLA, SXRD, and LCoS projection sets should be called mercury vapor or whatever type of lamp they use. And the new projectors could be called LED projectors as well, even if they are DLP devices. The point is that referring to the set by the type of backlight it uses is very misleading and is causing much confusion in the marketplace. Leonard |