Prev: 最小的P(X,Y)=__________.
Next: correlation co-efficient of a joint pdf
From: Inverse 19 mathematics on 12 Dec 2009 15:28
The above equation and the equations caused the flagaration aided by
the inspiration alone of Renowned Mathematician Escultura . Is
Fermats theorem a non theorem or what

1/1X 0.99 =0.99-1=-.01

1/3X0.99 =0.33-1/3=-0.003333333

1/3 X19 = 6.3333333-1/3 = 6.

6.3333333333333333333/0.3333333333333333333333333333=19


Remember that at 19 the ratio is 1:3 with the perpendicular certified
by the Renowned Escultura who has nothing else at the moment to do
with this flagarence. Mathematics is at a cone of 19 , not a parallel
track
From: Inverse 19 mathematics on 12 Dec 2009 15:47
On Dec 12, 2:28 pm, Inverse 19 mathematics <hope9...(a)verizon.net>
wrote:
>  The above equation and the equations caused the flagaration aided by
> the inspiration alone of Renowned Mathematician Escultura .  Is
> Fermats theorem a non theorem or what
>
> 1/1X 0.99 =0.99-1=-.01
>
> 1/3X0.99  =0.33-1/3=-0.003333333
>
> 1/3 X19 = 6.3333333-1/3 = 6.
>
> 6.3333333333333333333/0.3333333333333333333333333333=19
>
>  Remember that at 19 the ratio is 1:3 with the perpendicular certified
> by the Renowned Escultura who has nothing else at the moment to do
> with this flagarence. Mathematics is at a cone of 19 , not a parallel
> track

NOTE NOTE !! AT 19 the difference 0f +1 is cancelled by -1 since we
have proven that 19 equalizes at 0.1. BECAUSE 9 Equalizes with 10
because of the inverse-1, So Fermat is wrong, Wiley is Wrong, that is
not our area in ay case but they are wrong because your null zero is
wrong, But Wiley should retract his proof of Fermat what ever the
heck it is , not worth proving
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: 最小的P(X,Y)=__________.
Next: correlation co-efficient of a joint pdf