Prev: perf: Fix libdw-dev package name in error message
Next: [PATCH 2/2] [MTD] Call bdi_init() and bdi_register()
From: Paul E. McKenney on 26 Apr 2010 12:20 On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 05:19:38PM -0400, Miles Lane wrote: > [ 139.730133] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ] > [ 139.730136] --------------------------------------------------- > [ 139.730139] include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h:227 invoked > rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > [ 139.730142] > [ 139.730143] other info that might help us debug this: > [ 139.730144] > [ 139.730147] > [ 139.730148] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1 > [ 139.730151] 1 lock held by swapper/0: > [ 139.730158] #0: (net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:41){+.-...}, at: > [<ffffffff81046ad2>] run_timer_softirq+0x19f/0x370 > [ 139.730169] > [ 139.730170] stack backtrace: > [ 139.730173] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.34-rc5-git6 #28 > [ 139.730176] Call Trace: > [ 139.730178] <IRQ> [<ffffffff81065f9a>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0x9d/0xa5 > [ 139.730189] [<ffffffff813d1abf>] twsk_net+0x4f/0x57 > [ 139.730193] [<ffffffff813d2122>] __inet_twsk_kill+0x79/0xd0 > [ 139.730198] [<ffffffff813d24f9>] inet_twdr_do_twkill_work+0x59/0xba > [ 139.730203] [<ffffffff813d263d>] inet_twdr_hangman+0x30/0x97 > [ 139.730207] [<ffffffff81046b9e>] run_timer_softirq+0x26b/0x370 > [ 139.730211] [<ffffffff81046ad2>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x19f/0x370 > [ 139.730216] [<ffffffff813d260d>] ? inet_twdr_hangman+0x0/0x97 > [ 139.730221] [<ffffffff81040230>] ? __do_softirq+0x7f/0x252 > [ 139.730225] [<ffffffff810402f5>] __do_softirq+0x144/0x252 > [ 139.730230] [<ffffffff8100320c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x34 > [ 139.730235] [<ffffffff81004864>] do_softirq+0x38/0x80 > [ 139.730239] [<ffffffff8103fdc2>] irq_exit+0x45/0x94 > [ 139.730243] [<ffffffff81003fa9>] do_IRQ+0xad/0xc4 > [ 139.730247] [<ffffffff81432953>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf > [ 139.730250] <EOI> [<ffffffff81248383>] ? acpi_idle_enter_bm+0x262/0x28d > [ 139.730260] [<ffffffff81248379>] ? acpi_idle_enter_bm+0x258/0x28d > [ 139.730266] [<ffffffff8137b9cf>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x9c/0x13d > [ 139.730273] [<ffffffff810012c2>] cpu_idle+0xa5/0xfc > [ 139.730277] [<ffffffff8142abdd>] start_secondary+0x1f3/0x1fc This appears to be another symptom of the bug you located in your earlier testing, so either Eric Biederman sends a patch or I improvise. And thank you again for all your testing, Miles!!! Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |