Prev: [04/34] comedi: Uncripple 8255-based DIO subdevices
Next: [PATCH] Fix spelling fuction -> function in comments
From: Thomas Backlund on 6 Aug 2010 15:20
06.08.2010 21:32, Greg KH skrev:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.35.1 release.
> There are 38 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to
> this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let
> us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants
> to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
>
> Responses should be made by August 8, 2010, 18:00:00 UTC.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/stable-review/patch-2.6.35.1-rc1.gz
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


I think this one should be added as soon as possible too:


> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/linus/396e894d289d69bacf5acd983c97cd6e21a14c08
> Commit: 396e894d289d69bacf5acd983c97cd6e21a14c08
> Parent: f469461df6ff822f71b8737bda86eea20f16ff93
> Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra(a)chello.nl>
> AuthorDate: Fri Jul 9 15:12:27 2010 +0200
> Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo(a)elte.hu>
> CommitDate: Sat Jul 17 12:05:44 2010 +0200
>
> sched: Revert nohz_ratelimit() for now
>
> Norbert reported that nohz_ratelimit() causes his laptop to burn about
> 4W (40%) extra. For now back out the change and see if we can adjust
> the power management code to make better decisions.
>
> Reported-by: Norbert Preining <preining(a)logic.at>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra(a)chello.nl>
> Acked-by: Mike Galbraith <efault(a)gmx.de>
> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan(a)infradead.org>
> LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo(a)elte.hu>

--
Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Greg KH on 6 Aug 2010 15:40
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 10:14:46PM +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> 06.08.2010 21:32, Greg KH skrev:
> >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.35.1 release.
> >There are 38 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to
> >this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let
> >us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants
> >to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
> >
> >Responses should be made by August 8, 2010, 18:00:00 UTC.
> >Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> >The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/stable-review/patch-2.6.35.1-rc1.gz
> >and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> >thanks,
> >
> >greg k-h
>
>
> I think this one should be added as soon as possible too:
>
>
> >Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/linus/396e894d289d69bacf5acd983c97cd6e21a14c08
> >Commit: 396e894d289d69bacf5acd983c97cd6e21a14c08

As it just landed in Linus's tree about an hour ago, it was a bit late
for this release.

I'll queue it up for the next .35 release after this one.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Greg KH on 6 Aug 2010 16:40
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:22:10PM -0700, - wrote:
> Does not include the fix to this bug (introduced in 2.6.35.0):
>
> ���https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16506
>
> Affected file:� arch/x86/lib/atomic64_386_32.S
>
> This issue causes a compile-time blocking failure.� The patch fixes the problem for older versions of BINUTILS equal to or more recent than the minimum required version currently listed in file Documentation/Changes.
>
> Patch:� https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27360
>
>
> Please include this in 2.6.35.1 and any other affected kernels.
>
> The problem was introduced on February 24 through March 1, 2010 by multiple commits, starting with commit a7e926abc3adfbd2e5e20d2b46177adb4e313915.
>

Which exact patch that is in Linus's tree fixes the problem? Do you
have the git commit id of it? That's what I need here.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: H. Peter Anvin on 6 Aug 2010 17:20
On 08/06/2010 01:34 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:22:10PM -0700, - wrote:
>> Does not include the fix to this bug (introduced in 2.6.35.0):
>>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16506
>>
>> Affected file: arch/x86/lib/atomic64_386_32.S
>>
>> This issue causes a compile-time blocking failure. The patch fixes the problem for older versions of BINUTILS equal to or more recent than the minimum required version currently listed in file Documentation/Changes.
>>
>> Patch: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27360
>>
>> Please include this in 2.6.35.1 and any other affected kernels.
>>
>> The problem was introduced on February 24 through March 1, 2010 by multiple commits, starting with commit a7e926abc3adfbd2e5e20d2b46177adb4e313915.
>>
>
> Which exact patch that is in Linus's tree fixes the problem? Do you
> have the git commit id of it? That's what I need here.
>

Not upstream just yet.

-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Greg KH on 6 Aug 2010 20:00
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 02:12:40PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 08/06/2010 01:34 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:22:10PM -0700, - wrote:
> >>Does not include the fix to this bug (introduced in 2.6.35.0):
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16506
> >>
> >>Affected file: arch/x86/lib/atomic64_386_32.S
> >>
> >>This issue causes a compile-time blocking failure. The patch fixes the problem for older versions of BINUTILS equal to or more recent than the minimum required version currently listed in file Documentation/Changes.
> >>
> >>Patch: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27360
> >>
> >>Please include this in 2.6.35.1 and any other affected kernels.
> >>
> >>The problem was introduced on February 24 through March 1, 2010 by multiple commits, starting with commit a7e926abc3adfbd2e5e20d2b46177adb4e313915.
> >>
> >
> >Which exact patch that is in Linus's tree fixes the problem? Do you
> >have the git commit id of it? That's what I need here.
> >
>
> Not upstream just yet.

Ok, care to let stable(a)kernel.org know when it goes into Linus's tree?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: [04/34] comedi: Uncripple 8255-based DIO subdevices
Next: [PATCH] Fix spelling fuction -> function in comments