From: Arfa Daily on

"David Nebenzahl" <nobody(a)but.us.chickens> wrote in message
news:4b97e503$0$2357$822641b3(a)news.adtechcomputers.com...
> On 3/10/2010 9:48 AM Arfa Daily spake thus:
>
>>>> On 9 Mar, 00:20, David Nebenzahl <nob...(a)but.us.chickens> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm wondering if running a 3-volt device (cheap digital camera) on 3.3
>>>>> volts will hurt it. Yeah, I coulda gotten a 3-volt wall wart to run
>>>>> it,
>>>>> but it was expen$ive. The 3.3V regulator I got was a little more than
>>>>> a
>>>>> buck. Haven't tried it yet.
>>
>> There's nothing wrong with the diode route to drop the voltage by a
>> (reasonably) constant amount, but just use a Schottky type, which will
>> have a forward voltage drop of around 0.3 to 0.4v - or just about what
>> you're looking for ...
>
> Can they handle the current (~ 1A)?

Of course they can. All switchmode power supplies, including those that
provide many amps of output, use such diodes as their secondary-side
rectifiers ...

Arfa





From: Franc Zabkar on
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:20:07 -0800, David Nebenzahl
<nobody(a)but.us.chickens> put finger to keyboard and composed:

>I'm wondering if running a 3-volt device (cheap digital camera) on 3.3
>volts will hurt it. Yeah, I coulda gotten a 3-volt wall wart to run it,
>but it was expen$ive. The 3.3V regulator I got was a little more than a
>buck. Haven't tried it yet.

Unless the 3.3V regulator is a fixed type, it may be possible to bring
it down to 3.0V by changing a feedback resistor. Can we see a photo of
the PCB?

- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.
From: David Nebenzahl on
On 3/10/2010 7:45 PM Franc Zabkar spake thus:

> On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:20:07 -0800, David Nebenzahl
> <nobody(a)but.us.chickens> put finger to keyboard and composed:
>
>>I'm wondering if running a 3-volt device (cheap digital camera) on 3.3
>>volts will hurt it. Yeah, I coulda gotten a 3-volt wall wart to run it,
>>but it was expen$ive. The 3.3V regulator I got was a little more than a
>>buck. Haven't tried it yet.
>
> Unless the 3.3V regulator is a fixed type, it may be possible to bring
> it down to 3.0V by changing a feedback resistor. Can we see a photo of
> the PCB?

It's just a TO-220 regulator, for chrissakes. An NTE something something
.... don't have it here at the moment, but it's just a fixed 3.3V
regulator. So no, not possible to rejigger it w/a resistor.

I'm just going to use it as-is. I don't think 10% overvoltage will hurt
the cam.


--
You were wrong, and I'm man enough to admit it.

- a Usenet "apology"
From: William Sommerwerck on
> Unless the 3.3V regulator is a fixed type, it may be possible
> to bring it down to 3.0V by changing a feedback resistor.

One assumes that a 3.3V regulator is a fixed regulator (or otherwise the OP
would not be having a problem).

Fixed regulators' outputs can be changed, too, but only raised. This is
usually done by inserting a Zener diode in the ground-reference line.
(CMIIW.)


From: Franc Zabkar on
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:38:23 -0800, David Nebenzahl
<nobody(a)but.us.chickens> put finger to keyboard and composed:

>On 3/10/2010 7:45 PM Franc Zabkar spake thus:
>
>> On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:20:07 -0800, David Nebenzahl
>> <nobody(a)but.us.chickens> put finger to keyboard and composed:
>>
>>>I'm wondering if running a 3-volt device (cheap digital camera) on 3.3
>>>volts will hurt it. Yeah, I coulda gotten a 3-volt wall wart to run it,
>>>but it was expen$ive. The 3.3V regulator I got was a little more than a
>>>buck. Haven't tried it yet.
>>
>> Unless the 3.3V regulator is a fixed type, it may be possible to bring
>> it down to 3.0V by changing a feedback resistor. Can we see a photo of
>> the PCB?
>
>It's just a TO-220 regulator, for chrissakes. An NTE something something
>... don't have it here at the moment, but it's just a fixed 3.3V
>regulator. So no, not possible to rejigger it w/a resistor.
>
>I'm just going to use it as-is. I don't think 10% overvoltage will hurt
>the cam.

I thought that a standard 3-terminal regulator with a 1A current limit
may not be appropriate for the task. That's why I assumed you had
something more sophisticated. After all, you did get the camera for
$1. :-)

- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.