From: Randal L. Schwartz on
>>>>> "karthikbalaguru" == karthikbalaguru <karthikbalaguru79(a)gmail.com> writes:

karthikbalaguru> 1. This clause was objected to on the grounds that
karthikbalaguru> as people changed the license to reflect their
karthikbalaguru> name or organization,it led to escalating advertising
karthikbalaguru> requirements when programs were combined
karthikbalaguru> together in a software distributionevery
karthikbalaguru> occurrence of the license with a different name
karthikbalaguru> required a separate acknowledgment.

As I recall (having been part of this era :), it was a necessary requirement
by the state of California (or maybe it was DARPA?) having paid for part of
developing BSD that they both be credited for "your tax dollars at work" and
simultaneously not blamed if something went wrong. Hence, the first 4-clause
BSD license was literally for BSD itself needing this text.

--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn(a)stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: ezjail and freebsd-update
Next: mail encryption