From: Dingo on
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:26:12 +1000, "|-|ercules" <radgray123(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:

>"Dingo" <dingo(a)gmail.com> wrote ...
>> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:17:51 +1000, "|-|ercules" <radgray123(a)yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Then how come on 02 02 2002 I posted that part of deity is people
>>>who reply to me have their message reflected in their alias?
>>
>> Would it be because that's all part of your delusional psychotic state
>> perchance?
>
>No.

Well you would say that.
From: |-|ercules on
"Dingo" <dingo(a)gmail.com> wrote ...
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:26:12 +1000, "|-|ercules" <radgray123(a)yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>>"Dingo" <dingo(a)gmail.com> wrote ...
>>> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:17:51 +1000, "|-|ercules" <radgray123(a)yahoo.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Then how come on 02 02 2002 I posted that part of deity is people
>>>>who reply to me have their message reflected in their alias?
>>>
>>> Would it be because that's all part of your delusional psychotic state
>>> perchance?
>>
>>No.
>
> Well you would say that.

Truman is never wrong.

Herc