From: Pravin Kumar on 30 Dec 2009 05:28 I have observed bunch of 401.1 and 401.3 errors, on investigating further I noticed that for 99% of the times, for every 401.1 there's a 200 status code logged in the IIS logs. I took a pie chart in Indihiang Web log analyzer and noticed that there are 48% of 401 status codes. Is this something I should feel concerned about? This application in question is external facing and we haven't had any escalations from our customers . Any help/suggestions in this regard is highly appreciated Thanks, Pravin
From: Dan on 30 Dec 2009 08:51 "Pravin Kumar" <pravin_skumar(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:F22C92FD-802E-4F6C-B531-BB93015BFA81(a)microsoft.com... > I have observed bunch of 401.1 and 401.3 errors, on investigating further > I noticed that for 99% of the times, for every 401.1 there's a 200 status > code logged in the IIS logs. > I took a pie chart in Indihiang Web log analyzer and noticed that there > are 48% of 401 status codes. Is this something I should feel concerned > about? This application in question is external facing and we haven't had > any escalations from our customers . > > Any help/suggestions in this regard is highly appreciated > > > Thanks, > Pravin 401 is the code sent to the browser to tell it that it needs to authenticate. You'll then see a 200 if the browser then sends the request again with the appropriate user credentials (either cached, or the user types them in). Assuming that your sites use authentication rather than handle anonymous requests then this os perfectly normal. -- Dan
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Changing IIS port number Next: Unable to Bind IP/start website |