From: Peter on
"tony cooper" <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:vjobl5pv7rks5fp3oedvo0d4e2h10qkkg6(a)4ax.com...
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:29:23 +0100, Robert Spanjaard
> <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:43:23 -0500, Bowser wrote:
>>
>>> OK, I rushed them, and didn't include any comments, but I'll get to that
>>> later on. For now, take a look at the shots submitted by those shooters
>>> who actually take pictures and participate:
>>>
>>> http://www.pbase.com/shootin/468_degrees
>>>
>>> Let the flames fly!
>>
>>The best shot of the bunch, 46.8-Cooper-APCH.jpg, is shot at 72mm in 35mm
>>equivalent. It's real focal length is 48mm, but that's without the crop
>>factor.
>
> That's a flame that I can handle with equanimity. I assume that if
> the shot will be disqualified for not meeting the rules requirement,
> that I won't be receiving the large cash prize for "best shot of the
> bunch". Damn.
>
> No matter. A generous Nigerian bank manager has informed me that an
> even larger cash amount is available to me because he needs a
> dependable person to take over the assets of a deceased intestate
> client of his. Evidently, I have been recommended to him as a person
> of good character.
>
> I would like to thank whoever it was that recommended me.
>


I won a Dutch lottery. All they want is my bank account and a good faith
deposit to cover the cost of wiring the funds. When I offered them a free
account in Amsterdam to put the money in, they never responded. Oh well.

--
Peter

From: Peter on
"Bowser" <Canon(a)Nikon.Panny> wrote in message
news:g1kcl5h998792jndi7ndn1832nagukcfp2(a)4ax.com...
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:27:40 -0500, "Peter"
> <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote:
>
>>"Bowser" <Canon(a)Nikon.Panny> wrote in message
>>news:ebe9l5l7jjeaebkiojucelp7s3maqur14o(a)4ax.com...
>>> OK, I rushed them, and didn't include any comments, but I'll get to
>>> that later on. For now, take a look at the shots submitted by those
>>> shooters who actually take pictures and participate:
>>>
>>> http://www.pbase.com/shootin/468_degrees
>>>
>>> Let the flames fly!
>>
>>
>>How do I submit. I have one or two that should qualify
>
> Mail the entries to me at si dot moderator at yahoo dot com


done

--
Peter

From: Savageduck on
On 2010-01-19 20:57:26 -0800, tony cooper <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> said:

> On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:43:23 -0500, Bowser <Canon(a)Nikon.Panny> wrote:
>
>> OK, I rushed them, and didn't include any comments, but I'll get to
>> that later on. For now, take a look at the shots submitted by those
>> shooters who actually take pictures and participate:
>>
>> http://www.pbase.com/shootin/468_degrees
>>
> Savage Duck - El Paso de Robles is a nice, sharp image but the
> interest factor escapes me. I wonder why it was taken. The man
> waiting for the train is more interesting, but doesn't make it to Wow!
> (The black and white offered later is better) The two ladies is the
> best of the three because of the perspective. SD suffered this month
> from the �I really take good pictures, but I can't think of a good
> subject� syndrome.

I think you have put your finger on my problem for this shoot. ( I much
prefer the cropped B&W effort) That, and I have been trying to build up
some enthusiasm after loosing the D300. Anyway the old D70 did just
fine, and the good news is FedEx delivered a box of Nikon goodies this
morning. The new D300s is raring to go.
I need to plan a trip!
>
> Overall, what I notice the most in this group is sharpness of what
> should be sharp and the blur of what should be blurred. On the
> negative side, the subjects chosen � for the most part � are not all
> that interesting.

I guess we are just a bunch of boring old farts.



--
Regards,

Savageduck

From: Savageduck on
On 2010-01-19 21:52:24 -0800, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> said:

> On 2010-01-19 20:57:26 -0800, tony cooper <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> said:
>
>> On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:43:23 -0500, Bowser <Canon(a)Nikon.Panny> wrote:
>>
>>> OK, I rushed them, and didn't include any comments, but I'll get to
>>> that later on. For now, take a look at the shots submitted by those
>>> shooters who actually take pictures and participate:
>>>
>>> http://www.pbase.com/shootin/468_degrees
>>>
>> Savage Duck - El Paso de Robles is a nice, sharp image but the
>> interest factor escapes me. I wonder why it was taken. The man
>> waiting for the train is more interesting, but doesn't make it to Wow!
>> (The black and white offered later is better) The two ladies is the
>> best of the three because of the perspective. SD suffered this month
>> from the �I really take good pictures, but I can't think of a good
>> subject� syndrome.
>
> I think you have put your finger on my problem for this shoot. ( I much
> prefer the cropped B&W effort) That, and I have been trying to build up
> some enthusiasm after loosing the D300. Anyway the old D70 did just
> fine, and the good news is FedEx delivered a box of Nikon goodies this
> morning. The new D300s is raring to go.
> I need to plan a trip!
>>
>> Overall, what I notice the most in this group is sharpness of what
>> should be sharp and the blur of what should be blurred. On the
>> negative side, the subjects chosen � for the most part � are not all
>> that interesting.
>
> I guess we are just a bunch of boring old farts.

BTW, I really liked your APCH, who cares about the crop, it is a great image.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

From: Peter on
"Savageduck" <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in message
news:201001192152248930-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom...
> On 2010-01-19 20:57:26 -0800, tony cooper <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net>
> said:
>

>
> I think you have put your finger on my problem for this shoot. ( I much
> prefer the cropped B&W effort) That, and I have been trying to build up
> some enthusiasm after loosing the D300. Anyway the old D70 did just fine,
> and the good news is FedEx delivered a box of Nikon goodies this morning.
> The new D300s is raring to go.
> I need to plan a trip!


Are you going to South Africa again? <g>

--
Peter