From: Alan Coopersmith on
Ceri Davies <ceri_usenet(a)submonkey.net> writes in comp.unix.solaris:
|I had thought that I could get from Solaris 10 6/06 to Solaris 10 11/06
|(or equivalent functionality, at least) via patches.

You will eventually be able to update all existing commands/packages
to the same level as Solaris 10 11/06 by installing patches, but not
all of those patches have been released to SunSolve yet. (The QA
process for an integrated OS with a set level of software is different
than the QA for replacing one piece of the OS at a time as is done in
patches.)

New packages are usually only available by doing a full OS upgrade, not
by patching, though rare exceptions like ZFS have been made available as
patches that install the new packages.

--
________________________________________________________________________
Alan Coopersmith * alanc(a)alum.calberkeley.org * Alan.Coopersmith(a)Sun.COM
http://www.csua.berkeley.edu/~alanc/ * http://blogs.sun.com/alanc/
Working for, but definitely not speaking for, Sun Microsystems, Inc.
From: Daniel Rock on
Alan Coopersmith <alanc(a)alum.calberkeley.org> wrote:
> Ceri Davies <ceri_usenet(a)submonkey.net> writes in comp.unix.solaris:
> |I had thought that I could get from Solaris 10 6/06 to Solaris 10 11/06
> |(or equivalent functionality, at least) via patches.
>
> You will eventually be able to update all existing commands/packages
> to the same level as Solaris 10 11/06 by installing patches, but not
> all of those patches have been released to SunSolve yet.

For the impatient:

The patches are on the 11/06 DVD in the directory

Solaris_10/UpgradePatches

Just unzip all *.jar files in a directory and do a

patchadd -M `pwd` 1*

from that directory.


But beware: Use at your own risk. In the past it worked for my for
"upgrading" my 01/06 to 06/06, but I haven't tried the step to 11/06 yet.


--
Daniel
From: Rainer Beushausen on
Lion-O wrote:
>>I had thought that I could get from Solaris 10 6/06 to Solaris 10 11/06
>>(or equivalent functionality, at least) via patches. It seems not to be
>>the case, since I don't have everything:
>>
>> bash-3.00# cat /etc/release
>> Solaris 10 6/06 s10s_u2wos_09a SPARC
>> Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
>> Use is subject to license terms.
>> Assembled 09 June 2006
>
>
> Well, you assume wrong. I've got Solaris 10/x86 running for some time now and
> got myself a service contract (for $120/yr; get access to *everything* on
> SunSolve without the overhead of guided support (I can usually fix my own
> problems ;))) and this is happening on my system:
>
> magi:/home/peter $ cat /etc/release
> Solaris 10 3/05 s10_74L2a X86
> Copyright 2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> Use is subject to license terms.
> Assembled 22 January 2005
> magi:/home/peter $ man zfs | wc -l
> Reformatting page. Please Wait... done
> 1650
>
> So; a 03/05 release with ZFS support, how do you like that? :-)
>
> For some reason /etc/release isn't changed so you'll remain on that same
> version while the patches allow you to update your system with new features and
> security updates. I like this development since this once again shows you that
> you can't judge a Unix system by its appearances. So; running 3/5 doesn't
> automaticly imply that it doesn't support ZFS (the only new feature I can think
> of) perse.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
Are you sure you have the executables installed?
From: Thommy M. Malmström on
Lion-O wrote:
>> I had thought that I could get from Solaris 10 6/06 to Solaris 10 11/06
>> (or equivalent functionality, at least) via patches. It seems not to be
>> the case, since I don't have everything:
>>
>> bash-3.00# cat /etc/release
>> Solaris 10 6/06 s10s_u2wos_09a SPARC
>> Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
>> Use is subject to license terms.
>> Assembled 09 June 2006
>
> Well, you assume wrong. I've got Solaris 10/x86 running for some time now and
> got myself a service contract (for $120/yr; get access to *everything* on
> SunSolve without the overhead of guided support (I can usually fix my own
> problems ;))) and this is happening on my system:
>
> magi:/home/peter $ cat /etc/release
> Solaris 10 3/05 s10_74L2a X86
> Copyright 2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> Use is subject to license terms.
> Assembled 22 January 2005
> magi:/home/peter $ man zfs | wc -l
> Reformatting page. Please Wait... done
> 1650
>
> So; a 03/05 release with ZFS support, how do you like that? :-)

Here's something that is totally screwed up. A patch should only
fix/patch something that is already installed (*). A patch must never
install new packages/programs/functionality.

I hope this is a mistake...


/Thommy M.

*) Maybe it should also update/enhance/add functionality to already
installed packages. This is something we discussed a lot when I was at
Sun as Proactive Services Manager.


> For some reason /etc/release isn't changed so you'll remain on that same
> version while the patches allow you to update your system with new features and
> security updates. I like this development since this once again shows you that
> you can't judge a Unix system by its appearances. So; running 3/5 doesn't
> automaticly imply that it doesn't support ZFS (the only new feature I can think
> of) perse.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
From: Andrew Gabriel on
In article <ocNih.27151$E02.11222(a)newsb.telia.net>,
"Thommy M. Malmstr�m" <thommy.m.malmstrom(a)gmail.com> writes:
>
> Here's something that is totally screwed up. A patch should only
> fix/patch something that is already installed (*). A patch must never
> install new packages/programs/functionality.
>
> I hope this is a mistake...

man pages are in a package of their own, which will have been patched.
The fact that there's now a zfs manpage doesn't mean zfs is installed.

--
Andrew Gabriel