From: Shadow on
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 03:06:27 -0500, VanguardLH <V(a)nguard.LH> wrote:

>Shadow wrote:
>
>> Sorry mate, you are convincing the wrong guy.
>
>Look at your original post. You didn't post about YOUR criteria that
>was met by OO. You pondered why anyone ELSE would get MS Office. There
>are LOTS of reasons to stick with MS Office to continue with upgrades
>for it. They just don't happen to be your reasons because your not
>considering deployment in an enterprise environment where OO simply
>lacks all those demanded corporate features.
Just amazed by the number of downloads, that's all. And it's a
very big download, IMHO.
But I agree, my needs are very modest.
[]'s
From: Dustin Cook on
VanguardLH <V(a)nguard.LH> wrote in news:hva0jn$shb$1(a)news.albasani.net:

> Shadow wrote:
>
>> Sorry mate, you are convincing the wrong guy.
>
> Look at your original post. You didn't post about YOUR criteria that
> was met by OO. You pondered why anyone ELSE would get MS Office. There
> are LOTS of reasons to stick with MS Office to continue with upgrades
> for it. They just don't happen to be your reasons because your not
> considering deployment in an enterprise environment where OO simply
> lacks all those demanded corporate features.
>

Hi van, I'm a little late in this thread.. but, Msoffice 2007 I think it
was looked much different than office2003 (isn't that XP office?) ..

Office2010 looks even stranger to me. But, I was used to office2000...
everything has changed since then. It looks like the entire interface is a
giant webpage to me. :(


--
The bear went over the mountain to see what he could see. Hey! The other
side of the mountain was all that he could see! So he went back over the
mountain to see what he could see. Hey! The other side of the mountain was
all that he could see! - Green Jelly The Bear Song