From: J B on
"Chris Blunt" <mail(a)nospam.com> wrote in message
news:3afao5dp03005oh3sm5teevue9uhmnjv82(a)4ax.com...
>
> If you type those digits on a telephone keypad the corresponding
> letters spell TRIUMPH.

Curioser and curioser ;-)

Underwear or cars?


--
J B

From: Stephen Hammond on

>>
>> ****8 748674
>>
> You might be able to set up a 070 flextel divert finishing in those
> numbers?
>
> Steve Terry
> --
> Get a free Three 3pay Sim with �2 bonus after �10 top up
> http://freeagent.three.co.uk/stand/view/id/5276
Windsor Telecom do that sort of thing :)


From: Chris Blunt on
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:41:09 +0000, Mark <codvimyst(a)yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:

>On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:55:44 +0800, Chris Blunt <mail(a)nospam.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:05:39 +0000, Happi Monday <happi(a)munday.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On 22/02/2010 22:06, andy wrote:
>>>> On 22 Feb, 21:08, Happi Monday<ha...(a)munday.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 22/02/2010 15:03, BORG wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone have a SIM that ends in these numbers for sale ?
>>>>>
>>>>>> ****8 748674
>>>>>
>>>>> Why? Is it a good one?
>>>>
>>>> there will be triumph if it's found
>>>
>>>Googled it and found 8748674.com, but still, none the wiser :-(
>>
>>If you type those digits on a telephone keypad the corresponding
>>letters spell TRIUMPH.
>
>As many (most?) people dial from a phone book/contacts isn't the value
>of so-called golden numbers grossly overstated these days?
>
>I can't remember the last time I used the keypad to enter a number on
>my mobile. 'New' numbers typically get added from a received text.

The whole idea of expressing telephone numbers as a word has never
really worked for me. It seems to be something that has only ever
really caught on in the USA. I find it much easier to read a series of
digits when dialling a number rather than fumble around finding which
button corresponds to each letter of the word.

Chris
From: David Hearn on
Chris Blunt wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:41:09 +0000, Mark <codvimyst(a)yahoo.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:55:44 +0800, Chris Blunt <mail(a)nospam.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:05:39 +0000, Happi Monday <happi(a)munday.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 22/02/2010 22:06, andy wrote:
>>>>> On 22 Feb, 21:08, Happi Monday<ha...(a)munday.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 22/02/2010 15:03, BORG wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyone have a SIM that ends in these numbers for sale ?
>>>>>>> ****8 748674
>>>>>> Why? Is it a good one?
>>>>> there will be triumph if it's found
>>>> Googled it and found 8748674.com, but still, none the wiser :-(
>>> If you type those digits on a telephone keypad the corresponding
>>> letters spell TRIUMPH.
>> As many (most?) people dial from a phone book/contacts isn't the value
>> of so-called golden numbers grossly overstated these days?
>>
>> I can't remember the last time I used the keypad to enter a number on
>> my mobile. 'New' numbers typically get added from a received text.
>
> The whole idea of expressing telephone numbers as a word has never
> really worked for me. It seems to be something that has only ever
> really caught on in the USA. I find it much easier to read a series of
> digits when dialling a number rather than fumble around finding which
> button corresponds to each letter of the word.

It might be easier to type a series of digits, but it's probably easier
to remember a word, particularly if it directly relates to the company
it relates too.

Of course, once it's added to the phone book, it's not so necessary.

D
From: Adrian C on
On 25/02/2010 19:59, Chris Blunt wrote:

> The whole idea of expressing telephone numbers as a word has never
> really worked for me. It seems to be something that has only ever
> really caught on in the USA. I find it much easier to read a series of
> digits when dialling a number rather than fumble around finding which
> button corresponds to each letter of the word.
>

I have a Blackberry (Pearl 8210).

That keyboard does not have the same letter to number assignments as a
normal phone keypad, so if I'm given a word to dial it's not going to
work ... (unless there is a workaround?)

--
Adrian C