From: Henry on
Ironhead amused it many betters with the following insanity:
> Henry proved:

>> And of course, ironhead is "arguing" against both government
>> hired NIST employees and 9-11 Truth experts who all agree that
>> WTC7 did, in fact, drop at the rate of free fall. ironhead is
>> quite clearly as insane as it is dead wrong. As always, here's
>> hard proof. ironhead will be unable to address this proof with
>> anything but more of its insanity and lies. As we've all seen,
>> ironhead, like most blind faith followers of the government's
>> impossible 9-11 conspiracy theory, *never* posts any facts,
>> evidence, research, or references. There's a reason for that...<g>

>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDvNS9iMjzA

>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXTlaqXsm4k

>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw

>> Videos from: http://www.911speakout.org/

> It is not even subject to dispute that the collapse of WTC7 was 16+
> seconds, Hankie. It simply isn't.

Well, not if you're deluded, insane, and you "think" that NIST along
with thousands of 9-11 Truth experts know less than one lone usenet
nut job - a lone nut job whose kook rants are consistently proved dead
wrong and can't cite even *one* shred of evidence or source that
agrees with its moronic lies and kooky conspiracy rants. Thanks for
proving my point, nut job... <chuckle>

http://cms.ae911truth.org/index.php/evidence/35-key-facts/275-nist-admits-freefall.html





--



"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." --
Albert Einstein.

http://911research.wtc7.net
http://www.journalof911studies.com/
http://www.ae911truth.org


From: Bob Myers on
On 5/10/2010 10:41 AM, Henry wrote:
>
> Bin laden has been a CIA asset. As always, here's proof - not
> just of bin Laden's ties to the CIA, but of your simplemindedness,
> gullibility, and extreme ignorance, too. <g>
>
>

Always fascinating to see what constitutes "proof" in your
little world. It explains SO much...

Bob M.



From: Bob Myers on
On 5/10/2010 12:54 PM, Henry wrote:
> Bob Myers wrote:
>> On 5/10/2010 10:41 AM, Henry wrote:
>
>>> Bin laden has been a CIA asset. As always, here's proof - not
>>> just of bin Laden's ties to the CIA, but of your simplemindedness,
>>> gullibility, and extreme ignorance, too. <g>
>
>> Always fascinating to see what constitutes "proof" in your
>> little world.
>
> I love the way you delete the links

Are you under the impression that a reader would need the
links included in my quote of your message in order to find
them?

I mean, sure, perhaps if they were as incompetent in
research as you seem to be, but a normal person? Nahhhh...


Bob M.

From: Bob Myers on
On 5/11/2010 5:44 AM, Henry wrote:
>
> Funny (yet expected) that you're unable to detail any examples of
> this alleged incompetence. You can't refute a word of it.

At this point, I don't have to - it's been WAY more than adequately
refuted a very large number of times. And yet you keep posting
this drivel, as if mere repetition will somehow make it all real.

Bob M.

From: Bob Myers on
On 5/14/2010 11:10 AM, Henry wrote:
>
> Well, not if you're content to help me prove my point and continue
> to demonstrate that your cartoon conspiracy theory is a physically
> impossible and indefensible fairy tale. Thanks, Bob, but as we can
> see, I really didn't need your help... ;-)

As I am not a qualified psychotherapist - no, you don't.

Bob M.