Prev: Quantum Gravity 369.0: France Relates Elementary Particle Masses by "Number Theory" Equations
Next: Iarnbored makes HUGE stinking turd pile in newsgroups
From: Henry on 5 May 2010 09:01 Ironhead amused it many betters with the following insanity: > Henry proved: >> And of course, ironhead is "arguing" against both government >> hired NIST employees and 9-11 Truth experts who all agree that >> WTC7 did, in fact, drop at the rate of free fall. ironhead is >> quite clearly as insane as it is dead wrong. As always, here's >> hard proof. ironhead will be unable to address this proof with >> anything but more of its insanity and lies. As we've all seen, >> ironhead, like most blind faith followers of the government's >> impossible 9-11 conspiracy theory, *never* posts any facts, >> evidence, research, or references. There's a reason for that...<g> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDvNS9iMjzA >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXTlaqXsm4k >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw >> Videos from: http://www.911speakout.org/ > It is not even subject to dispute that the collapse of WTC7 was 16+ > seconds, Hankie. It simply isn't. Well, not if you're deluded, insane, and you "think" that NIST along with thousands of 9-11 Truth experts know less than one lone usenet nut job - a lone nut job whose kook rants are consistently proved dead wrong and can't cite even *one* shred of evidence or source that agrees with its moronic lies and kooky conspiracy rants. Thanks for proving my point, nut job... <chuckle> http://cms.ae911truth.org/index.php/evidence/35-key-facts/275-nist-admits-freefall.html -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: Bob Myers on 10 May 2010 14:44 On 5/10/2010 10:41 AM, Henry wrote: > > Bin laden has been a CIA asset. As always, here's proof - not > just of bin Laden's ties to the CIA, but of your simplemindedness, > gullibility, and extreme ignorance, too. <g> > > Always fascinating to see what constitutes "proof" in your little world. It explains SO much... Bob M.
From: Bob Myers on 10 May 2010 15:21 On 5/10/2010 12:54 PM, Henry wrote: > Bob Myers wrote: >> On 5/10/2010 10:41 AM, Henry wrote: > >>> Bin laden has been a CIA asset. As always, here's proof - not >>> just of bin Laden's ties to the CIA, but of your simplemindedness, >>> gullibility, and extreme ignorance, too. <g> > >> Always fascinating to see what constitutes "proof" in your >> little world. > > I love the way you delete the links Are you under the impression that a reader would need the links included in my quote of your message in order to find them? I mean, sure, perhaps if they were as incompetent in research as you seem to be, but a normal person? Nahhhh... Bob M.
From: Bob Myers on 11 May 2010 13:03 On 5/11/2010 5:44 AM, Henry wrote: > > Funny (yet expected) that you're unable to detail any examples of > this alleged incompetence. You can't refute a word of it. At this point, I don't have to - it's been WAY more than adequately refuted a very large number of times. And yet you keep posting this drivel, as if mere repetition will somehow make it all real. Bob M.
From: Bob Myers on 14 May 2010 13:29
On 5/14/2010 11:10 AM, Henry wrote: > > Well, not if you're content to help me prove my point and continue > to demonstrate that your cartoon conspiracy theory is a physically > impossible and indefensible fairy tale. Thanks, Bob, but as we can > see, I really didn't need your help... ;-) As I am not a qualified psychotherapist - no, you don't. Bob M. |