From: * US on
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:44:49 -0400, Johnny Asia <baying46584(a)mypacks.net> wrote:

>
>http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=20178
>
>
>NASA Flight Director Confirms 9/11 Aircraft Speed As The "Elephant In
>The Room"
>
>
>06/22/2010 - (PilotsFor911Truth.org) Recently Pilots For 9/11 Truth
>have analyzed the speeds reported for the aircraft utilized on 9/11.
>Numerous aviation experts have voiced their concerns regarding the
>extremely excessive speeds reported above Maximum Operating for the
>757 and 767, particularly, United and American Airlines 757/767
>Captains who have actual flight time in all 4 aircraft reportedly used
>on 9/11. These experts state the speeds are impossible to achieve near
>sea level in thick air if the aircraft were a standard 757/767 as
>reported. Combined with the fact the airplane which was reported to
>strike the south tower of the World Trade Center was also producing
>high G Loading while turning and pulling out from a dive, the whole
>issue becomes incomprehensible to fathom a standard 767 can perform
>such maneuvers at such intense speeds exceeding Maximum Operating
>limits of the aircraft. Especially for those who research the topic
>thoroughly and have expertise in aviation.
>
>Co-Founder of Pilots For 9/11 Truth Rob Balsamo recently interviewed a
>former NASA Flight Director in charge of flight control systems at the
>NASA Dryden Flight Research facility who is also speaking out after
>viewing the latest presentation by Pilots For 9/11 Truth - "9/11:
>World Trade Center Attack".
>
>Retired NASA Senior Executive Dwain Deets published his concerns on
>the matter at the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
>(AIAA) as follows:
>
>
> A Responsibility to Explain an Aeronautical Improbability
> Dwain Deets
> NASA Dryden Flight Research Center (Senior Executive Service -
>retired)
> AIAA Associate Fellow
>
> The airplane was UA175, a Boeing 767-200, shortly before
>crashing into World Trade Center Tower 2. Based on analysis of radar
>data, the National Transportation and Safety Board reported the
>groundspeed just before impact as 510 knots. This is well beyond the
>maximum operating velocity of 360 knots, and maximum dive velocity of
>410 knots. The possibilities as I see them are: (1) this wasn�t a
>standard 767-200; (2) the radar data was compromised in some manner;
>(3) the NTSB analysis was erroneous; or (4) the 767 flew well beyond
>its flight envelope, was controllable, and managed to hit a relatively
>small target. Which organization has the greater responsibility for
>acknowledging the elephant in the room? The NTSB, NASA, Boeing, or the
>AIAA? Have engineers authored papers, but the AIAA or NASA won�t
>publish them? Or, does the ethical responsibility lie not with
>organizations, but with individual aeronautical engineers? Have
>engineers just looked the other way?
>
>The above entry remained at the moderated AIAA Aerospace America Forum
>for approximately two weeks before being removed without explanation.
>Click "Who is Ethically Responsible" submitted by Dwain Deets at the
>Pilots For 9/11 Truth Forum for discussion on this entry at AIAA.
>
>Dwain Deets credentials and experience are as follows:
>
> Dwain Deets
> MS Physics, MS Eng
> Former Director, Aerospace Projects, NASA Dryden Flight
>Research Center
> Served as Director, Research Engineering Division at Dryden
> Recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Award
> Presidential Meritorious Rank Award in the Senior Executive
>Service (1988)
> Selected presenter of the Wright Brothers Lectureship in
>Aeronautics
> Associate Fellow - American Institute of Aeronautics and
>Astronautics (AIAA)
> Included in "Who's Who in Science and Engineering" 1993 - 2000
> Former Chairman of the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems
> - Committee of the Society of Automotive Engineers
> Former Member, AIAA Committee on Society and Aerospace
>Technology
> 37 year NASA career
>
>It is established based on corroborated expert statements, raw data,
>and precedent, that the extremely excessive speed reported for the
>9/11 aircraft is truly the "Elephant In The Room" and needs to be
>thoroughly investigated.
>
>For summary of speed analysis, please see article 9/11: Speeds
>Reported For World Trade Center Attack Aircraft Analyzed.
>
>To view the scene from "9/11: World Trade Center Attack" analyzing the
>reported speeds in more detail, please click here.
>
>For full detailed analysis covering the events which took place in New
>York City on September 11, 2001, interviews with experts, including
>analysis of "Hijacker" pilot skill, Black Box recovery and more...
>please view the latest presentation from Pilots For 9/11 Truth, "9/11:
>World Trade Center Attack".
>
>Founded in August 2006, Pilots For 9/11 Truth is a growing
>organization of aviation professionals from around the globe. The
>organization has also analyzed Flight Data provided by the National
>Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) for the Pentagon Attack and the
>events in Shanksville, PA. The data does not support the government
>story. The NTSB/FBI refuse to comment. Pilots For 9/11 Truth do not
>offer theory or point blame at this point in time. However, there is a
>growing mountain of conflicting information and data in which
>government agencies and officials refuse to acknowledge. Pilots For
>9/11 Truth Core member list continues to grow.
>
>http://pilotsfor911truth.org/core.html for full member list.