From: spudnik on 6 Jul 2010 21:45 here we go, again: prove that Bush knew he was lying about just *one* thing, please (such as, that cap&trade is "cap&tax," which he must've believed, because he didn't sign the God-am Kyoto Protocol). thank *you*, " ." > Bush and Cheney told a lot of lies. thus&so: the other one -- which he apparently also removed from his next rewrite of the book -- was that they were inadequately trained to fly a 757 into a building (but, most accidents occur at take-off & landing, so....) anyway, the pancake theory was not even wrong, so it is effectively a strawman -- that the Truthers believe in, categorically, because it seems to mean that free-fall is unattainable, except by "controlled demo." thus&so: it ain't the unions; it is the British cap&trade condominiums (ICE, CCX etc. ad vomitorium), and their slogan from the Kyoto Protocol, Beyondish Petroleumish (tm); hey, you can't get blood from a porous rock, but, apparently, you can get "fossilized fuel (tm)" from one. call your broker *before* Waxman's bill is passed by the Senate -- they are under *huge* pressure, with the silly/fake anti-cap&tax editorials from the WSUrinal and the teaparty (they believe, taxation without representation was the biggest issue of the Revolution .-) thus&so: yes; like, Shackleton et al's study, although I don't think that they really noticed or noted that. also, see G. Woillard's "Abrupt Collapse of the Eemian Interglacial, *sensu strictu*," via palynology, showing retrogressive vegetational succession (or desertification) in Grand Pile, France. > hot spells and cold spells presage the onset of glaciation. thus&so: a-hem, "note" the number of scientists explaining why, antarctica has cooled -- cooled? just as with the Arctic ice, all of it floating, maybe you are referring ot the Larsen Ice Shelf, sticking out on the peninsula, into the weather differentials. > explanations of why Antarctica has actually cooled. > http://www.scar.org/publications/occasionals/ACCE_25_Nov_2009.pdf > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8387137.stm thus&so: the models are very sparse grids, with heuristical connections between the hydrosphere, atmosphere & lithosphere e.g., if at all. then, the floating-point spec (IEEE-754, -854, I think) is inherently chaotic -- and variously implimented. OK, seriously; who is working for BP and my broker, here, on the cap&trade portfolio? thus&so: lies, polls & statistics. like the "skeptical statistician" said, in *The [Holy] Economist* newsmagazine (a.k.a. the voice of the British Foreign Office), cold kills far oftener than heat in this world ... although there could be some cool physiological reason for that. so, why do you believe that BP and other oilcos are against cap&trade -- they hate money? --BP's Next (or Last) Bailout of Wall St. and the City (of London, the gated community & financial district), CAP and TRADE (circa '91, Waxman's Acid Rain bill) --http://wlym.com
|
Pages: 1 Prev: ONLY 2 CHRISTMAS GROUPS GOOD, ALL OTHERS WILL FAIL Next: What gives you the right.? |