9-11 was, of course, not possible to be anything other than an inside job: COME SEE HOW KOOKER * IARNROT HATES THE US * MAKES A FOOL OF ITS HOMOPHOBIC BUSHKULTIE SELF BY IGNORING THE PROVEN FACT THAT ONLY AN INSIDE JOB IS PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Google blinks, may be barred from China.
Next: BannerAds was Re: Rules was Re: Standards was Re: Rebels wasRe: Yadda was Re: Murphy was Re: Mshncrtcl was Re: Reflection was Re: Boyswas Re: BTN Re: Scrt pony lingo was Re: Lingo was Indexing Re: NB Re: Sqillionaireclub
From: * US on 29 Jun 2010 22:10 On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 05:13:34 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >... have FAILED to NAME ONE ... You can't name one person who gained more than Bush and Cheney from 9/11. "The 9/11/01 Attack: Means, Motive, and Precedent" http://www.911review.com/reason.html Notice that no one can dispute what Ruppert says about the means, motives, and opportunities of 9/11. Ruppert's points remain undisputed. Ruppert's a trained investigator. http://www.fromthewilderness.com/ On Tue, 4 May 2010 20:34:45 -0700 (PDT), Iarnbored <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >BZZZZZT! WRONG! You're wrong, and, because of that, you have no facts. >... stupid kooker >klaims... nutbag. Tell us all about how you believe Bush and Cheney could never do anything at all that'd get Americans killed with deceit to profit the Carlyle Group and Halliburton. >... failed to provide any evidence ... You should just admit that you have none. >Not one single FACT ... You certainly haven't posted a fact, yet. >...web of lies starting with ... Tell us that one about how Bush and Cheney had no idea any attack could possibly occur in the USA.
From: * US on 29 Jun 2010 22:10 "No one knows the answer to that question" http://www.historycommons.org/essay.jsp?article=essayaninterestingday On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 05:15:23 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> who Hates US flailed in impotent kooker rage: >... lying again... Tell us all that one about how Bush and Cheney never had any inkling that an attack would occur. >...have yet to get one single thing right... Tell us all that one about how Bush and Cheney never had any inkling that an attack would occur, but immediately named Emmanuel Goldstein, er, Tim Osman, er ...
From: * US on 30 Jun 2010 07:07 The bushkultie certainly can't answer it. "No one knows the answer to that question" http://www.historycommons.org/essay.jsp?article=essayaninterestingday On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 05:15:23 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> who Hates US flailed in impotent kooker rage: >... lying again... Tell us all that one about how Bush and Cheney never had any inkling that an attack would occur. >...have yet to get one single thing right... Tell us all that one about how Bush and Cheney never had any inkling that an attack would occur, but immediately named Emmanuel Goldstein, er, Tim Osman, er ...
From: * US on 30 Jun 2010 07:07 On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:25:21 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrot <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >... no one ... Your neocon masters despise you. On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 05:13:34 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrot <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >... have FAILED to NAME ONE ... You can't name one person who gained more than Bush and Cheney from 9/11. "The 9/11/01 Attack: Means, Motive, and Precedent" http://www.911review.com/reason.html Notice that no one can dispute what Ruppert says about the means, motives, and opportunities of 9/11. Ruppert's points remain undisputed. Ruppert's a trained investigator. http://www.fromthewilderness.com/ On Tue, 4 May 2010 20:34:45 -0700 (PDT), Iarnbored <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >BZZZZZT! WRONG! You're wrong, and, because of that, you have no facts. >... stupid kooker >klaims... nutbag. Tell us all about how you believe Bush and Cheney could never do anything at all that'd get Americans killed with deceit to profit the Carlyle Group and Halliburton. >... failed to provide any evidence ... You should just admit that you have none. >Not one single FACT ... You certainly haven't posted a fact, yet. >...web of lies starting with ... Tell us that one about how Bush and Cheney had no idea any attack could possibly occur in the USA.
From: * US on 30 Jun 2010 09:09
The bushkultie is, indeed, no one. On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:25:21 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrot <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >... no one ... Your neocon masters despise you. On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 05:13:34 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrot <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >... have FAILED to NAME ONE ... You can't name one person who gained more than Bush and Cheney from 9/11. "The 9/11/01 Attack: Means, Motive, and Precedent" http://www.911review.com/reason.html Notice that no one can dispute what Ruppert says about the means, motives, and opportunities of 9/11. Ruppert's points remain undisputed. Ruppert's a trained investigator. http://www.fromthewilderness.com/ On Tue, 4 May 2010 20:34:45 -0700 (PDT), Iarnbored <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >BZZZZZT! WRONG! You're wrong, and, because of that, you have no facts. >... stupid kooker >klaims... nutbag. Tell us all about how you believe Bush and Cheney could never do anything at all that'd get Americans killed with deceit to profit the Carlyle Group and Halliburton. >... failed to provide any evidence ... You should just admit that you have none. >Not one single FACT ... You certainly haven't posted a fact, yet. >...web of lies starting with ... Tell us that one about how Bush and Cheney had no idea any attack could possibly occur in the USA. |