Prev: epiffany
Next: What's more general than Riemann space?
From: |-|ercules on 12 Jun 2010 19:03
"A B" <a(a)a.uk> wrote ...
> "|-|ercules" <radgray123(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:87ai6gFd69U1(a)mid.individual.net...
>> "A B" <a(a)a.uk> wrote in
>>> "|-|ercules" <radgray123(a)yahoo.com> wrote on 6th June:
>>>> Maybe you really are my disciple AB!
>>>> But unfortunately I doubt you will get anywhere near as good as those
>>>> answers
>>>> again, unless you continue POSTING THEM TO ME TO READ.
>>>>
>>>> It's like all my star signs are spot on, but it's my reading them that
>>>> divines the message,
>>>> not the astrologer.
>>>
>>> Glad you see it that way. I was expecting you to blow your top, to be
>>> honest!
>>> Of course, if you take the whole sentence, 1) is a clear yes. But if you
>>> just take the bit I noticed first, where my finger landed, it's a clear
>>> no. I've seen you do both before now. So it depends which answer you
>>> prefer.
>>
>>
>> NO NO NO NO NO! ;)
>>
>> The fact you INITIALLY saw "too fantastic" and THEN read the entire quote
>> is EXACTLY what the quote describes.
>> An initial disbelief about an initial disbelief. Here it is again, notice
>> the 'fractal' nature of your channel,
>> the channel itself was a 30 second recreation of "initially reluctant
>> realization".
>>
>>
>>
>> 1) Are Adam and Eve alive today? (using "The Secret Path", by Paul
>> Brunton.)
>> First thing I noticed was "too fantastic". But the complete sentence was:
>> "Your first response to this thought may be an attempt to shake it off as
>> being too fantastic, but in the sequence you will be compelled to consider
>> it seriously."
>>
>> See it? Your first response literally was shaking it off as too
>> fantastic.
>>
>> The channel not only answered your question, it described you channeling
>> it.
>>
>> So by saying it's 'either way' you would have to admit the coincidence
>> within a coincidence
>> was just a coincidence!
>
> Didn't think of that. That is rather cute, yes.

Literally 1,000,000 to one answer you got IMO.

The only better answer was my 2,000,000 to one "After creating both".

Assuming we both only had a small number of attempts at the question,
mine was question 7 in a video of 10 questions, the odds of fluking those
2 answers to the same question is staggering!

But it's entirely subjective to put high odds on an answer just because
it's very apt.

Herc: "Are Adam and Eve from the Genesis chapter alive today?"
Quote: "After creating both of those."

AB: "Are Adam and Eve alive today?
1st Quote: "too fantastic".
Full Quote: "Your first response to this thought may be an attempt to shake it off as
being too fantastic, but in the sequence you will be compelled to consider it seriously."

Herc

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: epiffany
Next: What's more general than Riemann space?