Prev: A bew analysis of the photon MOMENTUM formula!!
Next: Domain of Applicability Embedded in a 4d Manifold
From: Y.Porat on 29 Jun 2010 02:58
On Jun 28, 8:51 pm, "hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote:
> --- AHAHAHAHA... ahahahah... AHAHAHAHA... -----
>
> Yehiel "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>  flunkystein <luke.s...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Robert Higgins <robert_higg...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Robert Niggins <robert_higg...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > [snip]
>
> Addressing Higgie, Yehiel wrote:
>
> ... anyway psychopth, that is why i copyrighted it !!!
>
> Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> You understand as little of copyright law as you do of physics.
> There is no such thing as copyright of an "idea". Also, you
> should know, that there are countries that aren't parties to
> International agreements on Intellectual Property.
>
> funkenstein aka Flunky <luke.s...(a)gmail.com> wrote
> Amen to that! The sooner we can all follow suit, the sooner
> humanity  can start to live up to its potential.
>
> hanson wrote:
>
> "humanity, to live up to its potential"?... ahahaha.. AHAHA..
> What Potential?.. Are you the new Messiah or Mahdi, with
> another New Age religion that will fuckup humankind for
> another 2 millennia....  with **Flunky's Potential***... ahaha..
> good one.. ahaha... AHAHAHA...
>
> Robert Higgins aka Higgie, the Niggie wrote:
> [snip] ...Tom Potter will make get a plant in China (where
> he  lives) to print millions of t-shirts with the slogan
> "No Mass - No Real Physics", and Porat won't get a cent.
>
> hanson wrote:
>
> Wrong Niggie.  Potter said that he is a moral man, who
> unlike you, will share every cent with Porat
>
> Addressing Niggie, Yehiel wrote:
>
> "No Mass - No Real Physics" is registered and thousands
> of people saw the original and its date
>
> Higgie, the Niggie wrote:
>
> Doesn't matter - especially once you're dead. Look up
> software and book piracy rates in East Asia.
>
> Yehiel wrote:
>
> Mr funkenstein, jsut imagine that  YOU wa sworking hard and
> manyyears on some innovation or unprecedented finding
> whould youlike that someone  else that got nothing withit
> will stole your achevement and **felate it** to himself how
> whould you feel or react to that ??
> what kind of  a message is  such 'standard of behavior'  
> for peole (including the young generation) who  wish to work
> or even work hard hard in  order to ccreate something new ???
>
> hanson wrote:
>
> Now that is heavy, Yehiel, my old friend from Israel. You also
> said that you are not a "native English speaker". So, let me
> help you here for a moment.  You forgot an "l" in your "felate".
> The correct spelling is "fellate".
> But then you should have stopped with your advice and not
> inquired "how they feel after they fellate".... and talk about
> some hard, hard fellation standard for young people...
>
> Never the less, Yehie and you 2 Anti-Semites, Niggie
> and Flunky... THANKS for the laughs... ahahahanson
>
> PS:
> "to parrot" is copyrighted by Porat too.

------------------
thank you Hanson my friend
Potter & company may use the rule
NO MASS - NO REALPHYSICS!!
even if it is not heirs
my new copyright which is much more comprehensive
and has practical uses is:

NO MASS (***THE ONLY MASS***!!) -
NO REAL PHYSICS !!!
and if you have a copyright on detecting
Psychopaths
i use from now on your copyright !! (:-)
and

you will certianly agree with me that
'''Professor' Dr Higgins Pig - Malion
Dulitle (Million ) -- fits in to that definition ...

ATB
Y.Porat
----------------------------
From: hanson on 29 Jun 2010 03:45
--- AHAHAHAHA... ahahahah... AHAHAHAHA... -----
>
"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat(a)gmail.com> wrote:
"hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote:
> Yehiel "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> flunkystein <luke.s...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Robert Higgins <robert_higg...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Robert Niggins <robert_higg...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > [snip]
>
> Addressing Higgie, Yehiel wrote:
> ... anyway psychopth, that is why i copyrighted it !!!
>
> Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> You understand as little of copyright law as you do of physics.
> There is no such thing as copyright of an "idea". Also, you
> should know, that there are countries that aren't parties to
> International agreements on Intellectual Property.
>
> funkenstein aka Flunky <luke.s...(a)gmail.com> wrote
> Amen to that! The sooner we can all follow suit, the sooner
> humanity can start to live up to its potential.
>
> hanson wrote:
> "humanity, to live up to its potential"?... ahahaha.. AHAHA..
> What Potential?.. Are you the new Messiah or Mahdi, with
> another New Age religion that will fuckup humankind for
> another 2 millennia.... with **Flunky's Potential***... ahaha..
> good one.. ahaha... AHAHAHA...
>
> Robert Higgins aka Higgie, the Niggie wrote:
> [snip] ...Tom Potter will make get a plant in China (where
> he lives) to print millions of t-shirts with the slogan
> "No Mass - No Real Physics", and Porat won't get a cent.
>
> hanson wrote:
> Wrong Niggie. Potter said that he is a moral man, who
> unlike you, will share every cent with Porat
>
> Addressing Niggie, Yehiel wrote:
> "No Mass - No Real Physics" is registered and thousands
> of people saw the original and its date
>
> Higgie, the Niggie wrote:
> Doesn't matter - especially once you're dead. Look up
> software and book piracy rates in East Asia.
>
Yehiel wrote:
> Mr funkenstein, jsut imagine that YOU wa sworking hard and
> manyyears on some innovation or unprecedented finding
> whould youlike that someone else that got nothing withit will
stole your achevement and **felate it** to himself how
whould you feel or react to that ??
what kind of a message is such 'standard of behavior'
for peole (including the young generation) who wish to work
or even work hard hard in order to ccreate something new ???
>
hanson wrote:
Now that is heavy, Yehiel, my old friend from Israel. You also
said that you are not a "native English speaker". So, let me
help you here for a moment. You forgot an "l" in your "felate".
The correct spelling is "fellate".
But then you should have stopped with your advice and not
inquired "how they feel after they fellate".... and talk about
some hard, hard fellation standard for young people...
>
> Never the less, Yehie and you 2 Anti-Semites, Niggie
> and Flunky... THANKS for the laughs... ahahahanson
>
> PS:
> "to parrot" is copyrighted by Porat too.
>
Tehiel wrote:
thank you Hanson my friend
Potter & company may use the rule
NO MASS - NO REALPHYSICS!! ---- [1]
even if it is not heirs my new copyright
which is much more comprehensive
and has practical uses is:
NO MASS (***THE ONLY MASS***!!) - --- [2]
NO REAL PHYSICS !!!
and if you have a copyright on detecting Psychopaths
i use from now on your copyright !! (:-)
and you will certianly agree with me that
'''Professor' Dr Higgins Pig - Malion
Dulitle (Million ) -- fits in to that definition ...
>
hanson wrote:
yeah, yeah... ... ahahahaha.. There may be some
hardship for you in selling [2] with the "ONLY"
in it. --- [2] will put limitations on your [1]
IMHO [1] is better that [2].
The reason is that the Einstein Dingleberries have
created so many versions of mass, to justify their
SR. ... In their view mass is no longer only a lump
of matter, but mass has become the character that
does resist change against most forces, like in m = F/a .
So you will have to fight the Goebeles on that thing
too and lead them back onto the righteous path.
>
BTW, Yeti, you should aim for EVERYONE to
use your [1]. Not just only Potter and company.
Potter is your age and soon he will fade away...
But till then, Yehi, carry on with your mission and
be proud of it. ---- hanson
From: Inertial on 29 Jun 2010 05:11
"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5d7d047e-4ed5-4013-a919-0f957af475ad(a)g19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 28, 8:51 pm, "hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote:
>> --- AHAHAHAHA... ahahahah... AHAHAHAHA... -----
>>
>> Yehiel "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> flunkystein <luke.s...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Robert Higgins <robert_higg...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > > "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > Robert Niggins <robert_higg...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > > [snip]
>>
>> Addressing Higgie, Yehiel wrote:
>>
>> ... anyway psychopth, that is why i copyrighted it !!!
>>
>> Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> You understand as little of copyright law as you do of physics.
>> There is no such thing as copyright of an "idea". Also, you
>> should know, that there are countries that aren't parties to
>> International agreements on Intellectual Property.
>>
>> funkenstein aka Flunky <luke.s...(a)gmail.com> wrote
>> Amen to that! The sooner we can all follow suit, the sooner
>> humanity can start to live up to its potential.
>>
>> hanson wrote:
>>
>> "humanity, to live up to its potential"?... ahahaha.. AHAHA..
>> What Potential?.. Are you the new Messiah or Mahdi, with
>> another New Age religion that will fuckup humankind for
>> another 2 millennia.... with **Flunky's Potential***... ahaha..
>> good one.. ahaha... AHAHAHA...
>>
>> Robert Higgins aka Higgie, the Niggie wrote:
>> [snip] ...Tom Potter will make get a plant in China (where
>> he lives) to print millions of t-shirts with the slogan
>> "No Mass - No Real Physics", and Porat won't get a cent.
>>
>> hanson wrote:
>>
>> Wrong Niggie. Potter said that he is a moral man, who
>> unlike you, will share every cent with Porat
>>
>> Addressing Niggie, Yehiel wrote:
>>
>> "No Mass - No Real Physics" is registered and thousands
>> of people saw the original and its date
>>
>> Higgie, the Niggie wrote:
>>
>> Doesn't matter - especially once you're dead. Look up
>> software and book piracy rates in East Asia.
>>
>> Yehiel wrote:
>>
>> Mr funkenstein, jsut imagine that YOU wa sworking hard and
>> manyyears on some innovation or unprecedented finding
>> whould youlike that someone else that got nothing withit
>> will stole your achevement and **felate it** to himself how
>> whould you feel or react to that ??
>> what kind of a message is such 'standard of behavior'
>> for peole (including the young generation) who wish to work
>> or even work hard hard in order to ccreate something new ???
>>
>> hanson wrote:
>>
>> Now that is heavy, Yehiel, my old friend from Israel. You also
>> said that you are not a "native English speaker". So, let me
>> help you here for a moment. You forgot an "l" in your "felate".
>> The correct spelling is "fellate".
>> But then you should have stopped with your advice and not
>> inquired "how they feel after they fellate".... and talk about
>> some hard, hard fellation standard for young people...
>>
>> Never the less, Yehie and you 2 Anti-Semites, Niggie
>> and Flunky... THANKS for the laughs... ahahahanson
>>
>> PS:
>> "to parrot" is copyrighted by Porat too.
>
> ------------------
> thank you Hanson my friend
> Potter & company may use the rule
> NO MASS - NO REALPHYSICS!!
> even if it is not heirs
> my new copyright which is much more comprehensive
> and has practical uses is:
>
> NO MASS (***THE ONLY MASS***!!) -
> NO REAL PHYSICS !!!
> and if you have a copyright on detecting
> Psychopaths
> i use from now on your copyright !! (:-)
> and
>
> you will certianly agree with me that
> '''Professor' Dr Higgins Pig - Malion
> Dulitle (Million ) -- fits in to that definition ...

PORAT POSTS - NO REAL PHYSICS

From: Y.Porat on 29 Jun 2010 09:32
On Jun 29, 9:45 am, "hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote:
> --- AHAHAHAHA... ahahahah... AHAHAHAHA... -----
>
>
>
> "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> "hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote:
> > Yehiel "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > flunkystein <luke.s...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Robert Higgins <robert_higg...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Robert Niggins <robert_higg...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > [snip]
>
> > Addressing Higgie, Yehiel wrote:
> > ... anyway psychopth, that is why i copyrighted it !!!
>
> > Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> > You understand as little of copyright law as you do of physics.
> > There is no such thing as copyright of an "idea". Also, you
> > should know, that there are countries that aren't parties to
> > International agreements on Intellectual Property.
>
> > funkenstein aka Flunky <luke.s...(a)gmail.com> wrote
> > Amen to that! The sooner we can all follow suit, the sooner
> > humanity can start to live up to its potential.
>
> > hanson wrote:
> > "humanity, to live up to its potential"?... ahahaha.. AHAHA..
> > What Potential?.. Are you the new Messiah or Mahdi, with
> > another New Age religion that will fuckup humankind for
> > another 2 millennia.... with **Flunky's Potential***... ahaha..
> > good one.. ahaha... AHAHAHA...
>
> > Robert Higgins aka Higgie, the Niggie wrote:
> > [snip] ...Tom Potter will make get a plant in China (where
> > he lives) to print millions of t-shirts with the slogan
> > "No Mass - No Real Physics", and Porat won't get a cent.
>
> > hanson wrote:
> > Wrong Niggie. Potter said that he is a moral man, who
> > unlike you, will share every cent with Porat
>
> > Addressing Niggie, Yehiel wrote:
> > "No Mass - No Real Physics" is registered and thousands
> > of people saw the original and its date
>
> > Higgie, the Niggie wrote:
> > Doesn't matter - especially once you're dead. Look up
> > software and book piracy rates in East Asia.
>
> Yehiel wrote:
> > Mr funkenstein, jsut imagine that YOU wa sworking hard and
> > manyyears on some innovation or unprecedented finding
> > whould youlike that someone else that got nothing withit will
>
> stole your achevement and **felate it** to himself how
> whould you feel or react to that ??
> what kind of a message is such 'standard of behavior'
> for peole (including the young generation) who wish to work
> or even work hard hard in order to ccreate something new ???
>
> hanson wrote:
>
> Now that is heavy, Yehiel, my old friend from Israel. You also
> said that you are not a "native English speaker". So, let me
> help you here for a moment. You forgot an "l" in your "felate".
> The correct spelling is "fellate".
> But then you should have stopped with your advice and not
> inquired "how they feel after they fellate".... and talk about
> some hard, hard fellation standard for young people...
>
> > Never the less, Yehie and you 2 Anti-Semites, Niggie
> > and Flunky... THANKS for the laughs... ahahahanson
>
> > PS:
> > "to parrot" is copyrighted by Porat too.
>
> Tehiel wrote:
>
> thank you Hanson my friend
> Potter & company may use the rule
> NO   MASS - NO REALPHYSICS!!     ----  [1]
> even if it is  not heirs my new copyright    
> which  is much more comprehensive
> and has practical    uses is:
> NO MASS  (***THE  ONLY MASS***!!) -   --- [2]
> NO REAL PHYSICS !!!
> and if you have a copyright on detecting Psychopaths
> i use from now on your copyright  !!  (:-)
> and you will  certianly agree with   me that
> '''Professor'  Dr   Higgins   Pig - Malion
> Dulitle  (Million ) -- fits in to that definition  ...
>
> hanson wrote:
>
> yeah, yeah... ... ahahahaha.. There may be some
> hardship for you in selling [2] with the "ONLY"
> in it.  ---  [2] will put limitations on your [1]
> IMHO [1] is better that [2].
> The reason is that the Einstein Dingleberries have
> created so many versions of mass, to justify their
> SR.  ... In their view mass is no longer only a lump
> of matter, but mass has become the character that
> does resist change against most forces, like in m = F/a .
> So you will have to fight the Goebeles on that thing
> too and lead them back onto the righteous path.
>
> BTW, Yeti, you should aim for EVERYONE to
> use your [1]. Not just only Potter and company.
> Potter is your age and soon he will fade away...
> But till then, Yehi, carry on with your mission and
> be proud of it.     ----   hanson

------------------
HI Hanson
i was working hard along manyu years
toprove my 2

ie
please note how imporatnt is is
because just mass
then allthe parrot idiot will tell you
Oh fine but that is 'relativistic mass
and in case 1 2 3 it is zero rest mass
yet that is exactly the point i was owrking so
hard againt those parroting piggs
they brought always the compound formula with
energy and momentum in wichthey could obfuscate the issue by claming
that
th efirst part of it is zero and zero mass
so that could be anobfuscation untill
i
LOCATED THE ISSUE TO A FORMULA OF JUST MOMENTUM!
HERE THEY COULD NOT BOGLE THE
'BIETZIM that you mentioned above (:-)
WITH THEIR ZERO ENERGY
AND ZERO MASS

BECASUE NO ONE COULD SAY THAT
THE hf/c IS EVER ZERO !!

AND THE MASS IN IT AS WELL NOT ZERO
BECAUSE THERE IS THERE NOTING TO
MULTIPLY ANY OF THE MAIN DIMENSIONS THERE BY ANY ZERO !!!
2
THERE IS THERE NO FACTO0R
WHATSOEVER TO INDICATE
OR *CALCULATE **
Any Thing 'RELATIVISTIC'
so the relativistic fell down forever
and just mass ** the only mass** remains
now
i am not sure you and others get what a revolution it is!!!:
ALL THAT BIG PILES OF *PHYSICS*
ABOUT MASSLESS PARTICLES
OR EVEN FOR A SHORT TIME
'MASS -LESS'
WITH ALL ITS HUGE INVESTMENTS
IN IT
BECOME A BIG PILE OF BULLSHIT!!
and new directions have to be found !!!
ATB
Y.Porat
---------------------------


From: Inertial on 29 Jun 2010 09:39
"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6efdf315-a245-40f8-98b8-0f488d18b68b(a)w31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 29, 9:45 am, "hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote:
>> --- AHAHAHAHA... ahahahah... AHAHAHAHA... -----
>>
>>
>>
>> "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> "hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote:
>> > Yehiel "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> > flunkystein <luke.s...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > Robert Higgins <robert_higg...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > Robert Niggins <robert_higg...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > [snip]
>>
>> > Addressing Higgie, Yehiel wrote:
>> > ... anyway psychopth, that is why i copyrighted it !!!
>>
>> > Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > You understand as little of copyright law as you do of physics.
>> > There is no such thing as copyright of an "idea". Also, you
>> > should know, that there are countries that aren't parties to
>> > International agreements on Intellectual Property.
>>
>> > funkenstein aka Flunky <luke.s...(a)gmail.com> wrote
>> > Amen to that! The sooner we can all follow suit, the sooner
>> > humanity can start to live up to its potential.
>>
>> > hanson wrote:
>> > "humanity, to live up to its potential"?... ahahaha.. AHAHA..
>> > What Potential?.. Are you the new Messiah or Mahdi, with
>> > another New Age religion that will fuckup humankind for
>> > another 2 millennia.... with **Flunky's Potential***... ahaha..
>> > good one.. ahaha... AHAHAHA...
>>
>> > Robert Higgins aka Higgie, the Niggie wrote:
>> > [snip] ...Tom Potter will make get a plant in China (where
>> > he lives) to print millions of t-shirts with the slogan
>> > "No Mass - No Real Physics", and Porat won't get a cent.
>>
>> > hanson wrote:
>> > Wrong Niggie. Potter said that he is a moral man, who
>> > unlike you, will share every cent with Porat
>>
>> > Addressing Niggie, Yehiel wrote:
>> > "No Mass - No Real Physics" is registered and thousands
>> > of people saw the original and its date
>>
>> > Higgie, the Niggie wrote:
>> > Doesn't matter - especially once you're dead. Look up
>> > software and book piracy rates in East Asia.
>>
>> Yehiel wrote:
>> > Mr funkenstein, jsut imagine that YOU wa sworking hard and
>> > manyyears on some innovation or unprecedented finding
>> > whould youlike that someone else that got nothing withit will
>>
>> stole your achevement and **felate it** to himself how
>> whould you feel or react to that ??
>> what kind of a message is such 'standard of behavior'
>> for peole (including the young generation) who wish to work
>> or even work hard hard in order to ccreate something new ???
>>
>> hanson wrote:
>>
>> Now that is heavy, Yehiel, my old friend from Israel. You also
>> said that you are not a "native English speaker". So, let me
>> help you here for a moment. You forgot an "l" in your "felate".
>> The correct spelling is "fellate".
>> But then you should have stopped with your advice and not
>> inquired "how they feel after they fellate".... and talk about
>> some hard, hard fellation standard for young people...
>>
>> > Never the less, Yehie and you 2 Anti-Semites, Niggie
>> > and Flunky... THANKS for the laughs... ahahahanson
>>
>> > PS:
>> > "to parrot" is copyrighted by Porat too.
>>
>> Tehiel wrote:
>>
>> thank you Hanson my friend
>> Potter & company may use the rule
>> NO MASS - NO REALPHYSICS!! ---- [1]
>> even if it is not heirs my new copyright
>> which is much more comprehensive
>> and has practical uses is:
>> NO MASS (***THE ONLY MASS***!!) - --- [2]
>> NO REAL PHYSICS !!!
>> and if you have a copyright on detecting Psychopaths
>> i use from now on your copyright !! (:-)
>> and you will certianly agree with me that
>> '''Professor' Dr Higgins Pig - Malion
>> Dulitle (Million ) -- fits in to that definition ...
>>
>> hanson wrote:
>>
>> yeah, yeah... ... ahahahaha.. There may be some
>> hardship for you in selling [2] with the "ONLY"
>> in it. --- [2] will put limitations on your [1]
>> IMHO [1] is better that [2].
>> The reason is that the Einstein Dingleberries have
>> created so many versions of mass, to justify their
>> SR. ... In their view mass is no longer only a lump
>> of matter, but mass has become the character that
>> does resist change against most forces, like in m = F/a .
>> So you will have to fight the Goebeles on that thing
>> too and lead them back onto the righteous path.
>>
>> BTW, Yeti, you should aim for EVERYONE to
>> use your [1]. Not just only Potter and company.
>> Potter is your age and soon he will fade away...
>> But till then, Yehi, carry on with your mission and
>> be proud of it. ---- hanson
>
> ------------------
> HI Hanson
> i was working hard along manyu years
> toprove my 2
>
> ie
> please note how imporatnt is is
> because just mass
> then allthe parrot idiot will tell you
> Oh fine but that is 'relativistic mass
> and in case 1 2 3 it is zero rest mass
> yet that is exactly the point i was owrking so
> hard againt those parroting piggs
> they brought always the compound formula with
> energy and momentum in wichthey could obfuscate the issue by claming
> that
> th efirst part of it is zero and zero mass
> so that could be anobfuscation untill
> i
> LOCATED THE ISSUE TO A FORMULA OF JUST MOMENTUM!
> HERE THEY COULD NOT BOGLE THE
> 'BIETZIM that you mentioned above (:-)
> WITH THEIR ZERO ENERGY
> AND ZERO MASS

No one is claiming zero energy for a photon .. the energy is hf. Again, you
lie about what others claim merely so you can argue against it. That make
you a troll

Noone is claiming zero relativistic mass, only zero rest mass, for a photon
>
> BECASUE NO ONE COULD SAY THAT
> THE hf/c IS EVER ZERO !!

Noone HAS said it

> AND THE MASS IN IT AS WELL NOT ZERO

That's right .. the relativistic mass = hf/c^2

> BECAUSE THERE IS THERE NOTING TO
> MULTIPLY ANY OF THE MAIN DIMENSIONS THERE BY ANY ZERO !!!

Noone says there is

> 2
> THERE IS THERE NO FACTO0R
> WHATSOEVER TO INDICATE
> OR *CALCULATE **
> Any Thing 'RELATIVISTIC'

"Relativistic" does NOT mean "has gamma in it"

> so the relativistic fell down forever

Nope

> and just mass ** the only mass** remains
> now

Nope

> i am not sure you and others get what a revolution it is!!!:

Its not .. its going backwards

> ALL THAT BIG PILES OF *PHYSICS*
> ABOUT MASSLESS PARTICLES
> OR EVEN FOR A SHORT TIME
> 'MASS -LESS'
> WITH ALL ITS HUGE INVESTMENTS
> IN IT
> BECOME A BIG PILE OF BULLSHIT!!

No .. just you

> and new directions have to be found !!!

No need.


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: A bew analysis of the photon MOMENTUM formula!!
Next: Domain of Applicability Embedded in a 4d Manifold