Prev: World cup ISOs
Next: A lens so awful the image looks like it came from a mid-level superzoom P&S
From: Robert Coe on 14 Jun 2010 23:40
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:24:58 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote:
: Check out the smearing at the edge, the prism-like chromatic effects.
: 16mm Sony on the NEX 5. I'm still waiting for some person with access
: to PUT a decent, normal lens on the camera with an adapter (a 50mm
: legacy prime would do) and see if the fault lies entirely with the
: lens and not with the camera as well.
:
: http://www.antidotepictures.com/Photography/Sony-NEX/12495675_Axbi3#899406266_4L9BH-O-LB

Rich, you've convinced me: it's a crappy lens. You've made your point three or
four times. But I've never seen the lens and probably never will. And I've
never seen the camera it goes on and probably never will. So do I have to care
whether it's any good? And if so, why?

Bob
From: Pete on 16 Jun 2010 13:29
On 2010-06-16 17:56:20 +0100, Rich said:

> On Jun 16, 2:29 am, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>> RichA  <rander3...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Check out the smearing at the edge, the prism-like chromatic effects.
>>> 16mm Sony on the NEX 5.  I'm still waiting for some person with access
>>
>> Get a life.
>>
>
> Get a new slogan. That one hails from about 1992.

1983 or before.

--
Pete

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: World cup ISOs
Next: A lens so awful the image looks like it came from a mid-level superzoom P&S