Prev: Derivation of e=0,5MvvN(N-k) and explaining Doppler effect with f=c/wavelength, where c=c(mu, ep) + v
Next: COME SEE NUTBAG IARNROT WHO HATES THE US COMMIT AD HOMINEM FALLACY; 9/11 was not physically possible to be other an inside job. That neocon-pawn nutbaggery about ObL has been thoroughly disproven.
From: Y.Porat on 27 Jul 2010 06:41
On Jul 27, 8:18 am, "Cwatters"
<colin.wattersNOS...(a)TurnersOakNOSPAM.plus.com> wrote:
> "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:b15c7613-9b51-47f7-b79f-50ed45ec045a(a)m18g2000vbg.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > I have some  new suggestions about
> > how to make that  linear accelerator
> > (among the other missions )   --
> > a base for  a  much  more efficient Fusion reactor!!
>
> > yet it needs a spacial adaptation for that mission
> > and it has to be done right at the beginning of that
> > design .
> > (while that additional adaptation can  better serve - even  the other
> > missions as well !!!)
>
> > if they will address me  -
> > i will deliver it to them
>
> > TIA
> > Y.Porat
> > -------------------------
>
> Write a paper. Publish it.

-----------------
i ddi it here
i will not do it publicly
2
it needs some sketches drawings etc
verbal descriptions and explanations
in shoty - work

so
if those guys are not open minded enough
i a mnot going to 'break my head'
for them
3
do you have some ideal
(in case i bother to do it )
were could i publish such paper
4

let me bring here just one of the detailes
i have in mind:

at the opening side
and end side of that accelerator
to install some
mirror of particle
iow
to instal a device that will recoil back
the arriving particles
and by that will

RECYCLE THEM back BOTH :back

a
TH E MATTER (MASS)
b
PLUS SOME BIG PART OF ITS ENERGY
BACK AGAIN AND AGAIN !!

if you like *abstractly * --something like --
--- the way the laser is created

****yet it is not all the 'trick' **** !!!

at this stage i keep it for myself
and designers of that project if they will be
curious enough !!!

only someone like me that invested so much
in nuclear research can thing about it ....

TIA
Y.Porat
-----------------
From: PD on 27 Jul 2010 11:36
On Jul 26, 9:45 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I have some  new suggestions about
> how to make that  linear accelerator
> (among the other missions )   --
> a base for  a  much  more efficient Fusion reactor!!
>
> yet it needs a spacial adaptation for that mission
> and it has to be done right at the beginning of that
> design .
> (while that additional adaptation can  better serve - even  the other
> missions as well !!!)
>
> if they will address me  -
> i will deliver it to them
>
> TIA
> Y.Porat
> -------------------------

Designers of accelerators will not look here for your offer.

And if they did, they would not solicit people they don't know for a
private communication.

If you are worried about losing credit for the idea, then you should
either file a patent application or publish your work with a copyright
notice.

If you want some visibiity, then you have to muster the courage to
expose your ideas publicly, and invest the resources to do so.

From: eric gisse on 27 Jul 2010 18:13
PD wrote:

[...]

Y. Porat has only been babbling here for a decade. That he hasn't learned
any English during that period of time is completely incidental!
From: Y.Porat on 27 Jul 2010 22:15
On Jul 27, 5:36 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 26, 9:45 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I have some  new suggestions about
> > how to make that  linear accelerator
> > (among the other missions )   --
> > a base for  a  much  more efficient Fusion reactor!!
>
> > yet it needs a spacial adaptation for that mission
> > and it has to be done right at the beginning of that
> > design .
> > (while that additional adaptation can  better serve - even  the other
> > missions as well !!!)
>
> > if they will address me  -
> > i will deliver it to them
>
> > TIA
> > Y.Porat
> > -------------------------
>
> Designers of accelerators will not look here for your offer.
>
> And if they did, they would not solicit people they don't know for a
> private communication.
>
> If you are worried about losing credit for the idea, then you should
> either file a patent application or publish your work with a copyright
> notice.
>
> If you want some visibiity, then you have to muster the courage to
> expose your ideas publicly, and invest the resources to do so.

------------------
onwe of the reasons i publish it here
is
TO TESTIT FIRST BY PEER REVIEW!!
though i am quite sure i am right
now
i was not sure forunatance that
installing soert of a a *particle mirror'
at bothe ends of the accelerator
was not already suggested or even done!!!
so i wanter to test it
and know
is it is already in the original design !!
so you see my aim was totest it
STEP BY STEP
but i expect
that peer rewiw to be done by
**CLEAVER** **HONEST** PEOPLE!!!
not most of those crooks that i get here !!
you talk about
'courage to expose....'

i would like to ask you
can i expect to expose things to ANONYMOUS CR0OKS THAT DO NOT
HAVE THE COURAGE AND INTEGRITY
TO REVEAL EVEN THEIT **REAL IDENTITY*???!!!

so you can ask me why do you sometimes expose ideas
and even make some discussion
with those 'people' ??
can you guess why i do it
in a limited (measurable ) way ?? (:-)

2
i asked you not to pop into my threads
and even so you popped into it!!
and i responded
so you can ask

why did i even so - answer you
in a 'reasonable' 'civilized' way ?

the answer is that
i felt with my intuition and experience
with people
that your intervention now in this case
was
a
apposite
b
unlike some other cases --
there was some sincerity in it !!!

i still didnt see yet the responses of say
inertial
or Gisse
or Higgins etc etc
but i can guess
**even before reading it **
WHAT WILL BE IN IT !!!
so probably even if i will respond to them
it wil not be no matter what i will say or suggest
3

btw PD
can both of us - cooperate in making some publishing
by your publishing company !??!!

ATB
Y.Porat
------------------------








From: Y.Porat on 27 Jul 2010 22:24
On Jul 28, 1:48 am, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Y.Porat wrote:
> > I have some  new suggestions about
> > how to make that  linear accelerator
> > (among the other missions )   --
> > a base for  a  much  more efficient Fusion reactor!!
> > yet it needs a spacial adaptation for that mission
> > and it has to be done right at the beginning of that
> > design .
> > (while that additional adaptation can  better serve - even  the other
> > missions as well !!!)
> > if they will address me  -
> > i will deliver it to them
>
> <giggle>
>
> A little knowledge goes a long way. You should look up:
>    A) What types of particles will be used in the linear accelerator?
>    B) What types of particles are needed to induce fusion?
>
> Then you could answer the crucial question: are they the same?
>
>         Hint: if they are not the same, your "suggestion" is useless.
>
> Tom Roberts

------------------
that is why i am talking about some
REDESIGN OF THE PROJEXCT
BEFORE IT STARTS
iow
to keep some open eyes and ears to as many suggestions that can be
no matter from whom they come
with no prejudices !!!

after all
the budget there is AT LEST
13 billions of public money !!!
and no need to** repeat** the "flop" of the
current LHC
Y.P
----------------------------------------
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Derivation of e=0,5MvvN(N-k) and explaining Doppler effect with f=c/wavelength, where c=c(mu, ep) + v
Next: COME SEE NUTBAG IARNROT WHO HATES THE US COMMIT AD HOMINEM FALLACY; 9/11 was not physically possible to be other an inside job. That neocon-pawn nutbaggery about ObL has been thoroughly disproven.