From: Lew on 31 Oct 2009 09:11 Mike Schilling wrote: > Lew wrote: >> Even today, about three-quarters or more of the google hits on the >> gold vs. feathers question assert that the pound of feathers weighs >> more. > > It might be true anyway. Though if Wikipedia also thinks the feathers > weigh more, it's pretty much a lost cause. I assume you mean, "if Wikipedia also thinks that feathers use avoirdupois pounds and gold uses troy pounds, thus a pound (avoirdupois) of feathers weighs more than a pound (troy) of gold, it's pretty much a lost cause." Wikipedia, that bastion of encyclopedic and infallible truth that one should never, ever doubt, says that precious metals are weighed in troy ounces but not troy pounds. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troy_weight> <http://www.troy-ounce.com/> agrees, though it cites the Wikipedia article as one of its sources, so perhaps that doesn't surprise. This is not true. <http://www.sizes.com/units/troy_weight.htm> tells us that "[i]n the United States, troy weight remains legal," and directs us to page 20 of the 1982 "Uniform Regulation for the Method of Sale of Commodities, model legislation proposed for adoption by individual states by the National Conference on Weights and Measures." <http://www.sizes.com/library/USA/NatlConfWtsandMeasures.pdf> which would mandate > 2.17.2. Quantity. -- > The unit of measure and the method of sale of precious metals, > if the price is based in part or wholly on a weight determination, > shall be either troy weight or SI units. <http://www.goldcalculator.com/index_files/page0033.htm#Troy Pound (0.37kg):> calls the troy pound a "mass unit is used to measure precious metals." <http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/TroyPound.html> asserts that troy pounds are used to measure precious metals. <http://www.govmint.com/item/Classic-Half-Troy-Pound-Bag-of-US-Silver/1803581/2> offers silver weighed in terms of troy pounds, proving definitively that someone, at least, still uses that unit for precious metal. Same for <http://www.shopwiki.com/Bags+of+Buffalo+Nickels+New+Half+Troy+Pound+Bag+of+Buffalo+Nickels+III> <http://www.dondienterprises.com/id12.html> <http://www.milliondollarbill.com/goldfinger01.html> and many other current commercial sites. The fact that precious metals (or simulations thereof) are actually sold by troy pounds proves that the unit is still in use. Ergo, a pound (troy) of gold is lighter than a pound (avoirdupois) of feathers. The question remains tricky. -- Lew
From: Arved Sandstrom on 31 Oct 2009 10:08 Lew wrote: [ SNIP ] > The fact that precious metals (or simulations thereof) are actually sold > by troy pounds proves that the unit is still in use. Ergo, a pound > (troy) of gold is lighter than a pound (avoirdupois) of feathers. > > The question remains tricky. You'd have to decide what country you ask the riddle in. In the US it still applies, as you pointed out. In the UK, Canada, Australia, and divers other jurisdictions it no longer does. For example, the Canada Weights and Measures Act, under the Canadian Units section, allows for the troy ounce to measure precious metals, but not the troy pound. Similarly, the UK Weights Measures Act disallows use of the troy pound. And so on and so forth. I agree that it's an old riddle, but the trick answer depends on the legal system of weights and measures being used at the specific time and place of asking. It'll have no meaning at all sometime in the future when Imperial measures completely die as legal units of trade. AHS
From: Mike Schilling on 31 Oct 2009 12:49 Lew wrote: > Mike Schilling wrote: >> Lew wrote: >>> Even today, about three-quarters or more of the google hits on the >>> gold vs. feathers question assert that the pound of feathers >>> weighs >>> more. >> >> It might be true anyway. Though if Wikipedia also thinks the >> feathers weigh more, it's pretty much a lost cause. > > I assume you mean, "if Wikipedia also thinks that feathers use > avoirdupois pounds and gold uses troy pounds, thus a pound > (avoirdupois) of feathers weighs more than a pound (troy) of gold, > it's pretty much a lost cause." Nothing so complicated; I just meant that Wikipedia's usually wrong.
|
Pages: 1 Prev: How many illegal character for jdom? Next: Daylight Saving Shift |