Prev: Droolin Doolin's multiplication table
Next: The Planet Attractor Action, July 28, 2010 johnreed
From: Igor on 29 Jul 2010 09:51
On Jul 28, 7:02 pm, Uncle Ben <b...(a)greenba.com> wrote:

> Pray for John Parker's sanity. He still needs it.
>
> Uncle Ben

He never had it.
From: mpc755 on 29 Jul 2010 10:46
On Jul 28, 9:29 pm, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 29, 10:30 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 28, 8:24 pm, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 29, 9:02 am, Uncle Ben <b...(a)greenba.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Our friend John Parker (aka "Androcles") sincerely believes that he
> > > > has found a mistake in Einstein's 1905 paper on SR, to wit, that
> > > > since
>
> > > > the length of a "moving" rod w.r.t. a "moving" frame of reference
> > > > (moving with the same velocity as the "moving" rod)
>
> > > > is longer than the length of that rod w.r.t. a "stationary" frame
> > > > (stationary in the laboratory), (a result that everyone accepts except
> > > > other cranks),
>
> > > > therefore, the "moving" rod has been stretched by its motion.
>
> > > Whether or not it stretched depends on what its length was BEFORE it
> > > was moving (assuming that it ever was at reset in the 'stationary'
> > > frame.  SR only says that its length measured from a relatively moving
> > > frame will be shorter than the length measured from a comoving frame.
> > > It doesn't say anything about what may have happened to the rod in
> > > order for it to have achieved whatever motion it has .. there are
> > > numerous possibilities.  Refer to Bell's spaceship scenario for one
> > > possibility (where there IS intrinsic  stretching if one wants the rod
> > > to maintain the same length in the stationary frame when moving as
> > > when at rest)
>
> [snip irrelevant spam]
>
> Nothing left.  mpc755 is nothing but another ignorant troll

The dark matter ripple caused by the galaxy cluster is evidence dark
matter is the medium of space. Evidence of the medium of space
described as 'irrelevant spam'. Delusional denial once again on
display.

Does the ripple eventually reach the Earth? I will take your non-
answer to be what it is, evidence of your delusional denial state of
existence.

'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html

"Astronomers using NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view
of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two
galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark matter, which is
somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the
water."

The ripple will eventually reach the Earth and this is evidence dark
matter exists from the galaxy cluster to the Earth. This is evidence
dark matter is the medium of space in which light waves propagate.

Pressure exerted towards matter by dark matter displaced by the matter
is gravity.
From: mpc755 on 29 Jul 2010 10:48
On Jul 29, 12:53 am, Bruce Richmond <bsr3...(a)my-deja.com> wrote:
> On Jul 28, 8:30 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 28, 8:24 pm, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 29, 9:02 am, Uncle Ben <b...(a)greenba.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Our friend John Parker (aka "Androcles") sincerely believes that he
> > > > has found a mistake in Einstein's 1905 paper on SR, to wit, that
> > > > since
>
> > > > the length of a "moving" rod w.r.t. a "moving" frame of reference
> > > > (moving with the same velocity as the "moving" rod)
>
> > > > is longer than the length of that rod w.r.t. a "stationary" frame
> > > > (stationary in the laboratory), (a result that everyone accepts except
> > > > other cranks),
>
> > > > therefore, the "moving" rod has been stretched by its motion.
>
> > > Whether or not it stretched depends on what its length was BEFORE it
> > > was moving (assuming that it ever was at reset in the 'stationary'
> > > frame.  SR only says that its length measured from a relatively moving
> > > frame will be shorter than the length measured from a comoving frame.
> > > It doesn't say anything about what may have happened to the rod in
> > > order for it to have achieved whatever motion it has .. there are
> > > numerous possibilities.  Refer to Bell's spaceship scenario for one
> > > possibility (where there IS intrinsic  stretching if one wants the rod
> > > to maintain the same length in the stationary frame when moving as
> > > when at rest)
>
> > Does the ripple eventually reach the Earth?
>
> I used to drink Ripple occasionally.  I'm quite sure it all returned
> to earth eventually.  How long it took often depended on how much I
> drank ;)
>

Mocking what is arguably the most important discovery in the history
of physics. Evidence of the medium of space. The dark matter ripple is
evidence dark matter is the medium of space. Delusional denial once
again on display.

> > I will take your non-
> > answer to be what it is, evidence of your delusional denial state of
> > existence.
>
> > 'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_featur...
>
> > "Astronomers using NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view
> > of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two
> > galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark matter, which is
> > somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the
> > water."
>
> > The ripple will eventually reach the Earth and this is evidence dark
> > matter exists from the galaxy cluster to the Earth. This is evidence
> > dark matter is the medium of space in which light waves propagate.
>
> > Pressure exerted towards matter by dark matter displaced by the matter
> > is gravity.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
>

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Droolin Doolin's multiplication table
Next: The Planet Attractor Action, July 28, 2010 johnreed