Prev: Unrelenting Time
Next: explaining why group/ring/field are important in math #548 Correcting Math
From: glird on 29 Mar 2010 19:03
On Mar 29, 5:49 pm, Dr J Walker <"Androcles"> wrote:

> "Hence if x' be taken infinitesimally small",
> @tau/@x' + 1/(c-v) * @tau/@t = @tau/@0 + 1/(c+v)*@tau/@t
>
> And just what is @tau/@x'?

It denotes the difference in clock settings, @tau, of two
clocks of the moving system that are @x' = @(x-vt) apart
as measured by the stationary system K.

> How do the coordinate x' and the coordinate 0 "be taken
> infinitesimally small"?

Contrary to your opinion, Jonnie, there is no
co-ordinate x' in Einstein's equations despite your
defective use of the Greek letter kappa instead of
his letter k to denote the second of the TWO systems in
his equations to there.

> Einstein makes it rather obvious he's never studied calculus and didn't
> know the difference between the distance from 0 to x' and the points
> 0 and x'.

He probably did study differential calculus in high school (as I
did) thus knew that if he set x' infinitely small, as it would be IF
it was a point, then there would be NO distance between clocks A and B
that are an INFINITESIMALLY small (=/= 0) distance apart.

glird
From: BURT on 29 Mar 2010 19:25
On Mar 29, 4:03 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Mar 29, 5:49 pm, Dr J Walker <"Androcles"> wrote:
>
> > "Hence if x' be taken infinitesimally small",
> > @tau/@x' + 1/(c-v) * @tau/@t = @tau/@0 + 1/(c+v)*@tau/@t
>
> > And just what is @tau/@x'?
>
>   It denotes the difference in clock settings, @tau, of two
> clocks of the moving system that are @x' = @(x-vt) apart
> as measured by the stationary system K.
>
> > How do the coordinate x' and the coordinate 0 "be taken
> > infinitesimally small"?
>
>  Contrary to your opinion, Jonnie, there is no
> co-ordinate x' in Einstein's equations despite your
> defective use of the Greek letter kappa instead of
> his letter k to denote the second of the TWO systems in
> his equations to there.
>
> > Einstein makes it rather obvious he's never studied calculus and didn't
> > know the difference between the distance from 0 to x' and the points
> > 0 and x'.
>
>   He probably did study differential calculus in high school (as I
> did) thus knew that if he set x' infinitely small, as it would be IF
> it was a point, then there would be NO distance between clocks A and B
> that are an INFINITESIMALLY small (=/= 0) distance apart.
>
> glird

When energy begins to flow through space it has new motion that can be
detected as weight. If gamma point energy goes up then it was an
increase in flow. If gamma goes down it was a decrease in flow. It
takes energy to decrease energy of flow.

Mitch Raemsch
From: glird on 31 Mar 2010 21:29
On Mar 29, 5:49 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_x>
babbled:
>
>< We establish by definition that Einstein got his knickers in a twist when
he said "we establish by definition that the "time" required by a ray
to
travel from A to B equals the "time" it requires to travel from B to
A,
and claimed
1/2[tau(0,0,0,t) + tau(0,0,0,t + x'/(c+v) + x'/(c-v))] = tau(x',0,0,t
+ x'/(c-v)).
It would have been far easier to write
tau(x',0,0, t+ x'/(c-v)) = tau(0,0,0, t+ x'/(c+v))
and then differentiate that, but then that would make Einstein's silly
spoof
rather too obvious. >

Go ahead and differentiate your equation, if you can.
Btw, John-boy, Einstein's equation is correct but yours is not.
{Although he didn't get his next equation from the long one you wrote
above
nor vice versa-is-wersa, nor did he differentiate anything at all; HIS
next equation inserted what yours left out: the required offset, dtau,
of two moving esynched clocks that are x' = x-vt apart as measured by
the system taken as stationary. Without the offset, dtau/dx', the time
from A to B would NOT equal the time from B to A, as measured by the
moving system whose time, tau, is a function of x and t.

glird
From: BURT on 1 Apr 2010 17:01
On Mar 29, 4:25 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Mar 29, 4:03 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 29, 5:49 pm, Dr J Walker <"Androcles"> wrote:
>
> > > "Hence if x' be taken infinitesimally small",
> > > @tau/@x' + 1/(c-v) * @tau/@t = @tau/@0 + 1/(c+v)*@tau/@t
>
> > > And just what is @tau/@x'?
>
> >   It denotes the difference in clock settings, @tau, of two
> > clocks of the moving system that are @x' = @(x-vt) apart
> > as measured by the stationary system K.
>
> > > How do the coordinate x' and the coordinate 0 "be taken
> > > infinitesimally small"?
>
> >  Contrary to your opinion, Jonnie, there is no
> > co-ordinate x' in Einstein's equations despite your
> > defective use of the Greek letter kappa instead of
> > his letter k to denote the second of the TWO systems in
> > his equations to there.
>
> > > Einstein makes it rather obvious he's never studied calculus and didn't
> > > know the difference between the distance from 0 to x' and the points
> > > 0 and x'.
>
> >   He probably did study differential calculus in high school (as I
> > did) thus knew that if he set x' infinitely small, as it would be IF
> > it was a point, then there would be NO distance between clocks A and B
> > that are an INFINITESIMALLY small (=/= 0) distance apart.
>
> > glird
>
> When energy begins to flow through space it has new motion that can be
> detected as weight. If gamma point energy goes up then it was an
> increase in flow. If gamma goes down it was a decrease in flow. It
> takes energy to decrease energy of flow.
>
> Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

It takes energy substance to decrease energy substance as in
deceleration from high flow.

Mitch Raemsch
From: Don Stockbauer on 1 Apr 2010 23:21
On Apr 1, 4:01 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Mar 29, 4:25 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 29, 4:03 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 29, 5:49 pm, Dr J Walker <"Androcles"> wrote:
>
> > > > "Hence if x' be taken infinitesimally small",
> > > > @tau/@x' + 1/(c-v) * @tau/@t = @tau/@0 + 1/(c+v)*@tau/@t
>
> > > > And just what is @tau/@x'?
>
> > > It denotes the difference in clock settings, @tau, of two
> > > clocks of the moving system that are @x' = @(x-vt) apart
> > > as measured by the stationary system K.
>
> > > > How do the coordinate x' and the coordinate 0 "be taken
> > > > infinitesimally small"?
>
> > > Contrary to your opinion, Jonnie, there is no
> > > co-ordinate x' in Einstein's equations despite your
> > > defective use of the Greek letter kappa instead of
> > > his letter k to denote the second of the TWO systems in
> > > his equations to there.
>
> > > > Einstein makes it rather obvious he's never studied calculus and didn't
> > > > know the difference between the distance from 0 to x' and the points
> > > > 0 and x'.
>
> > > He probably did study differential calculus in high school (as I
> > > did) thus knew that if he set x' infinitely small, as it would be IF
> > > it was a point, then there would be NO distance between clocks A and B
> > > that are an INFINITESIMALLY small (=/= 0) distance apart.
>
> > > glird
>
> > When energy begins to flow through space it has new motion that can be
> > detected as weight. If gamma point energy goes up then it was an
> > increase in flow. If gamma goes down it was a decrease in flow. It
> > takes energy to decrease energy of flow.
>
> > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> It takes energy substance to decrease energy substance as in
> deceleration from high flow.
>
> Mitch Raemsch

Why do you make up this gibberish just to attempt to get attention?
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Unrelenting Time
Next: explaining why group/ring/field are important in math #548 Correcting Math