From: Matthias Hopf on 3 Aug 2010 06:20 A bit of background about this patch: acpi_video_bus_get_devices() explicitly calls acpi_video_device_enumerate() before acpi_video_bus_get_one_device(), which does acpi_video_device_bind(). In _enumerate(), active_list[] is created, with .bind_info explicitly set to NULL, while the related .bind_info entry in video_device_list is set to the acpi_video_device ptr in _bind(). The .bind_info is later used in acpi_video_resume() to re-set the backlight - but it's only evaluated on the active_list[], on which all .bind_info are NULL by construction. This results in backlight not being restored, if the BIOS doesn't do this by itself already. The patch resolves this by replacing the active_list[] traversal by a video_device_list traversal, but due to the nature of the issue I'm unsure whether the original issue isn't of more principal quality. I don't understand why the list is (partially) transformed into an array in the first place, especially as both the array *and* the list are used in the code... Thanks Matthias -- Matthias Hopf <mhopf(a)suse.de> __ __ __ Maxfeldstr. 5 / 90409 Nuernberg (_ | | (_ |__ mat(a)mshopf.de Phone +49-911-74053-715 __) |_| __) |__ R & D www.mshopf.de -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Matthias Hopf on 4 Aug 2010 07:10 On Aug 04, 10 09:27:29 +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 18:11 +0800, Matthias Hopf wrote: > > The .bind_info is later used in acpi_video_resume() to re-set the backlight > > - but it's only evaluated on the active_list[], on which all .bind_info are > > NULL by construction. > why? .bind_info in active_list is initialized in acpi_video_device_bind. Hm. Right. acpi_video_bus_get_one_device() is called after _enumerate(). Dunno why I didn't read this correctly. > > I don't understand > > why the list is (partially) transformed into an array in the first place, > > especially as both the array *and* the list are used in the code... > > > no, the active_list is an array in fact, which equals > acpi_video_bus->attached_array. Maybe we need to change it to a more > proper name. :-) > I'm still wondering why the patch works for you. Same to me. > could you please attach the acpidump output of this laptop? Will do. > please rebuild your kernel with CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG=y, and reboot with > kernel parameter "acpi.debug_layer=0x10 acpi.debug_level=0x400". > and attach the dmesg output after resume, both w/ and w/o the patch you > attached. The most intriguing thing here is that the system starts writing to /var/log/messages continuously, thus dmesg output is sort-of worthless. This might be a reasonable side effect, it might be an indication of the original issue. I'll try to compile something for you. Thanks Matthias -- Matthias Hopf <mhopf(a)suse.de> __ __ __ Maxfeldstr. 5 / 90409 Nuernberg (_ | | (_ |__ mat(a)mshopf.de Phone +49-911-74053-715 __) |_| __) |__ R & D www.mshopf.de -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|
Pages: 1 Prev: [PATCH] Cite nconfig in the README. Next: tc6393xb: fix wrong goto labels for error handling |