From: Ron Johnson on
On 07/01/2010 06:53 AM, Krishna Chandra Prajapati wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's true. There is no difference in the installation process of OS (AMD
> or Intel). If you are using it for personal purpose i386 is preferred.
> Other wise i recommend i686.
>

There is no i686 arch in Debian. The i386 arch, though, does have
i686 *kernels*.

--
Seek truth from facts.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4C2C8561.5040002(a)cox.net
From: Merciadri Luca on
Krishna Chandra Prajapati wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's true. There is no difference in the installation process of OS
> (AMD or Intel).
Thanks.
> If you are using it for personal purpose i386 is preferred. Other wise
> i recommend i686.
Why (briefly)? (Or give me a pointer.)

Thanks.

--
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/
I use PGP. If there is an incompatibility problem with your mail
client, please contact me.




From: Andrei Popescu on
On Jo, 01 iul 10, 15:06:33, Merciadri Luca wrote:
> Krishna Chandra Prajapati wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It's true. There is no difference in the installation process of OS
> > (AMD or Intel).
> Thanks.
> > If you are using it for personal purpose i386 is preferred. Other wise
> > i recommend i686.
> Why (briefly)? (Or give me a pointer.)

Not sure what Krishna meant, but if you do go for i386 have a look in
the package management system for any packages containing 686
in the name. The description should have more details, but these are
usually the same packages optimized for the respective processors and
all Pentium Pro or later processors will benefit from it.

You might also want to run the -amd64 kernel, which will give you a
mixed system (64bit kernel, 32bit userland).

Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
From: Merciadri Luca on
Thanks. I'll have a deeper look in this as soon as possible.

Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Jo, 01 iul 10, 15:06:33, Merciadri Luca wrote:
>
>> Krishna Chandra Prajapati wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It's true. There is no difference in the installation process of OS
>>> (AMD or Intel).
>>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>> If you are using it for personal purpose i386 is preferred. Other wise
>>> i recommend i686.
>>>
>> Why (briefly)? (Or give me a pointer.)
>>
>
> Not sure what Krishna meant, but if you do go for i386 have a look in
> the package management system for any packages containing 686
> in the name. The description should have more details, but these are
> usually the same packages optimized for the respective processors and
> all Pentium Pro or later processors will benefit from it.
>
> You might also want to run the -amd64 kernel, which will give you a
> mixed system (64bit kernel, 32bit userland).
>
> Regards,
> Andrei
>


--
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/
I use PGP. If there is an incompatibility problem with your mail
client, please contact me.




From: Mihamina Rakotomandimby on
> Merciadri Luca <Luca.Merciadri(a)student.ulg.ac.be> :
>I've never used AMD-based computers, and I've therefore always chosen
>i386 as I habitually deal with Intel stuff.

I have ever choosen AMD when possible and they run all Linux flavours
like a charm.
Just for the record,
- I like challengers, and AMD is Intel's one (with more or less success)
- ATI (graphics) are now owned by AMD and
http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/amd-will-deliver-open-graphics-drivers/
http://www.linux.com/archive/feed/119049
--

Architecte Informatique chez Blueline/Gulfsat:
Administration Systeme, Recherche & Developpement
+261 34 56 000 19


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100702102842.3c663ed7(a)packard.rktmb.org