AMD accuses Nvidia of disabling multi-core CPU support in PhysX, ??to make GPU's look better
in [Chips]
|
Prev: Prize website question?
Next: AMD accuses Nvidia of disabling multi-core CPU support in PhysX,??to make GPU's look better
From: Robert Redelmeier on 24 Jan 2010 12:15 In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips Robert Myers <rbmyersusa(a)gmail.com> wrote in part: > On Jan 23, 11:10�am, Robert Redelmeier <red...(a)ev1.net.invalid> wrote: >> In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips Robert Myers <rbmyers...(a)gmail.com> wrote in part: >> > On Jan 21, 10:37�am, Yousuf Khan <bbb...(a)spammenot.yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> AMD has accused Nvidia of corrupting the PhysX API, making it >> >> unable to use CPU resources properly, when prior to Nvidia's >> >> purchase it could easily make use of these resources. >> >> > Looks more and more like SCO every day. >> >> Please be clear: �_who_ looks like SCO? �AMD for whining, >> or NVidia for slanting code? > SCO is (was?) the company who made a living by suing > and accusing others. It's a tough business. Good or bad? AFAICS, SCO sued MS just to get funding for suing Linux. And probably got a sweetheart settlement. IMHO, SCO is an MS beard. > AMD looks more and more like SCO with every new accusation. ??? suing was SCO's main business. AMD still sells ~5 B$/yr of chips, and the Intel settlment was only 1.25 B$, paid over ? years. They don't look at all alike. And even if they did, so what? It's an ad-hominem. > Sore losers are always calling the instant replay booth. Even if so, that does not mean that everyone who calls the "instant replay booth" is a sore loser. Perhaps the truly wronged might also call? All A are B does not mean all B are A. -- Robert R
From: Robert Myers on 24 Jan 2010 19:08 On Jan 24, 6:50 pm, Yousuf Khan <bbb...(a)spammenot.yahoo.com> wrote: > Robert Redelmeier wrote: > > In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips Robert Myers <rbmyers...(a)gmail.com> wrote in part: > >> Sore losers are always calling the instant replay booth. > > > Even if so, that does not mean that everyone who calls the > > "instant replay booth" is a sore loser. Perhaps the truly > > wronged might also call? All A are B does not mean all B are A. > > Arguing logically with R. Myers is like arguing logically with a road, > it's going only where it's going and it has always been going that way. :) That's right. You and Prof. Redelmeier go play. Robert.
From: chrisv on 1 Feb 2010 12:38 Yousuf Khan wrote: >Robert Redelmeier wrote: >> In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips Robert Myers <rbmyersusa(a)gmail.com> wrote in part: >>> Sore losers are always calling the instant replay booth. >> >> Even if so, that does not mean that everyone who calls the >> "instant replay booth" is a sore loser. Perhaps the truly >> wronged might also call? All A are B does not mean all B are A. > >Arguing logically with R. Myers is like arguing logically with a road, >it's going only where it's going and it has always been going that way. :) He's too smart for us, you know.
From: Robert Myers on 1 Feb 2010 23:21
On Feb 1, 12:38 pm, chrisv <chr...(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: > Yousuf Khan wrote: > >Robert Redelmeier wrote: > >> In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips Robert Myers <rbmyers...(a)gmail.com> wrote in part: > >>> Sore losers are always calling the instant replay booth. > > >> Even if so, that does not mean that everyone who calls the > >> "instant replay booth" is a sore loser. Perhaps the truly > >> wronged might also call? All A are B does not mean all B are A. > > >Arguing logically with R. Myers is like arguing logically with a road, > >it's going only where it's going and it has always been going that way. :) > > He's too smart for us, you know. This is easy, Chris. If I'm not fun to talk to, then don't bother with me and don't bother me. Robert. |