Prev: [Samba] Problem mounting Samba shares from a Linux machine
Next: 3.5 in Debian Squeeze?
From: Steve Langasek on 24 Mar 2010 02:20
Hi Jeff,

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:10:44AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> This release is primarily a number of small bugfixes and cleanups. I
> wanted to do a release with those prior to the coming overhaul of
> mount.cifs to allow it to more safely be installed setuid root.

Could you please provide detached GPG signatures for cifs-utils on the
download site, so we have some cryptographic assurance of the integrity of
the tarballs as we do for the samba tarballs?

Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek(a)ubuntu.com vorlon(a)debian.org
From: Jeff Layton on 24 Mar 2010 08:00
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 23:11:17 -0700
Steve Langasek <vorlon(a)debian.org> wrote:

> Hi Jeff,
>
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:10:44AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > This release is primarily a number of small bugfixes and cleanups. I
> > wanted to do a release with those prior to the coming overhaul of
> > mount.cifs to allow it to more safely be installed setuid root.
>
> Could you please provide detached GPG signatures for cifs-utils on the
> download site, so we have some cryptographic assurance of the integrity of
> the tarballs as we do for the samba tarballs?
>
> Cheers,

Good point. I'm working now on getting a "cifs-utils" mail alias set up
that I can stuff into the key. Once I do so, I'll go back and sign all
of the tarballs and make sure they're signed on release in the future.

Thanks,
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton(a)samba.org>
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: [Samba] Problem mounting Samba shares from a Linux machine
Next: 3.5 in Debian Squeeze?