Prev: ANNOUNCE list (was Re: New PGXN Extension site)
Next: modular se-pgsql as proof-of-concept
From: "Joshua D. Drake" on 17 Jun 2010 11:31
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 13:22 +0000, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
>
> > What I'm referring to? The fact that at least last time I was looking
> > at this, most (all other?) moderators *only* approve things. And never
> > reject them, instead letting the timeout take care of things thatn
> > shouldn't be posted.
>
> Certainly not all, becuase I don't do things that way. And certainly
> not -announce, because I don't think Marc works that way either.

Uhh the complaint above is bogus. I know I don't just approve things
either.

>
> As far as the original complaint, if one suspects something is stuck
> in the queue, a message to #postgresql might be the quickest way
> to get someone's attention, followed by an email to -www.
>

Agreed.

> But my all means, let's add more mods, especially to -announce as
> Marc, Rob, and I are all in the same time zone.
>

Agreed.

Joshua D. Drake




--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: ANNOUNCE list (was Re: New PGXN Extension site)
Next: modular se-pgsql as proof-of-concept