Prev: what do do if the candle flame is too tiny? tip the melted waxoff? ARE YOU SURE?
Next: Three times happening together
From: Romanise on 4 Mar 2010 06:01
On Mar 4, 10:45 am, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...(a)bigpond.com> wrote:
> On Mar 4, 6:59 pm, Romanise <josh...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 3, 10:28 pm, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...(a)bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> > > Why don't you study the thread "exactly why the theory of special
> > > relativity is total rubbish" in our very sci, which is also
> > > crossposted to science groups where all scientists may have a fair go
> > > at it?  Some 200 articles have been written there.  I have defended
> > > myself more than adequately.  NO one managed to *prove* my ideas
> > > wrong, whereas I made many startling new observations and deductions
> > > in support of my new theories in physics.
>
> > Are following from the same thread?
>
> > -* That's nonsense. Few physicists monitor these newsgroups, and fewer
> > still
> > respond to obviously idiotic postings like yours.
> > ====
>
> > -*  This is like claiming that you have found a cure for cancer. Then
> > to
> > test whether your claim is correct, you walk into the lobby of a
> > medical insurance company and holler to everyone standing there, "I
> > have a cure for cancer! Now is your chance to prove that it's not!"
> > And if you are ignored in the lobby of an office building, you tell
> > yourself that you've given the world a chance to prove you wrong, and
> > they didn't, so you must be right, and could somebody please award you
> > some fame for having cured cancer now.
> > ====
> > -* as expected you run away from the challenge, as you know you are
> > wrong.  Typical cowardly crackpot.
> > Though I'm sure you'll be back sometime soon spouting the same lies
> > and nonsense and claiming that noone has proved you wrong .. which is
> > the biggest lie of all.

I am sure all your hopes from and efforts on Usenet will be brought to
fruition by poster Zinnic.

Have you no limerick for other posters who make fun of you like the
editors of Journals did before you were pushed onto Usenet?

> Heh-heh, these one-sided quotes prove beyond doubt what an old
> treacherous fool you are!  Highly unbalanced and stupid, you do not
> even note what I have been saying.  You can only understand what other
> fools and scoundrels like you are saying - thus ignoring the responses
> of Zinnic, who is the only one who is worthy of attention, because his
> approach is at least scientific unlike all others, and who has been
> half-convinced so far.  If all else with similar honesty follow him,
> e=mcc will go down the drain, for by allowing the extra distance +/- d
> for all light travel D along measured lengths, he outs the Lorentz
> transformation.
>
> And why should you support me in any way, as a typical traitor you
> must stab your own kind, or at least pull them down as a malevolent
> crab.   What with the abominable example of the unspeakable great-unca
> gandi, what else can be expected from old and despicable fools, rotten
> to the core?
>
> Enough, it is evident that you have been a parasite all your life,
> living off the productivity of others.  Genius is its own reward, and
> I enjoy it immensely.  I don't write for the fools and scoundrels, for
> I don't write for money.  Which, of course, is all you snake-rapists
> can understand.  Sad, but it does take all types to make a world.

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: what do do if the candle flame is too tiny? tip the melted waxoff? ARE YOU SURE?
Next: Three times happening together