Prev: Cisco 861W opinions?
Next: ASA 5505 behind ASA 5505
From: Dogg Child on 7 Jun 2010 08:13
Hi all,

excuse me at first if i don't explain this properly, i'll try...
I have one internet link, and two ASA5505's, and two "networks" that need
access from and to internet.
The main idea is that 1st 5505 would be configured with 3 interfaces -
In,Out, DMZ.
Through DMZ i would forward all traffic from one public ip (exmpl. x.x.x.5)
to 2nd 5505. Basically DMZ on 1st 5505 would be connected to Out interface
on 2nd 5505, and not filtering anything.
Out interf. on 1st 5505 would have other pub ip (exmpl. x.x.x.4).
Behind both 5505's i have different subnets that requiers some access from
and to the internet.

q1: Would that kind of wiring and connecting work?

q2: if that would work, is it possible to configure / limit speed/bandwidth
for DMZ "link"?

q3: i guess when 2nd 5505 initiate IPsec tunnel (site-to-site) that the 1st
one wouldn't be aware of that (licence issues?) ?

q4: all services that needs to be accessible from the internet behind 2nd
5505 would be accessible if configured only on 2nd 5505 ?

that's it so far, i hope i wouln't bother you anymore.

Tnx in advance & regards,
--


....
:: Dogg.Child:::Honored.member.of.The.Wu-Tang.Clan ::

dogg[AltGr+V]nkc-sisak.hr
....



From: Jyri Korhonen on 8 Jun 2010 08:53
"Dogg Child" <dogg[AltGr+V]@nkc-sisak.hr> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> excuse me at first if i don't explain this properly, i'll try...
> I have one internet link, and two ASA5505's, and two "networks" that need
> access from and to internet.
> The main idea is that 1st 5505 would be configured with 3 interfaces -
> In,Out, DMZ.
> Through DMZ i would forward all traffic from one public ip (exmpl. x.x.x.5)
> to 2nd 5505. Basically DMZ on 1st 5505 would be connected to Out interface
> on 2nd 5505, and not filtering anything.
> Out interf. on 1st 5505 would have other pub ip (exmpl. x.x.x.4).
> Behind both 5505's i have different subnets that requiers some access from
> and to the internet.
>
> q1: Would that kind of wiring and connecting work?

Yes, I believe so. But I don't understand why you need the second 5505.

> q2: if that would work, is it possible to configure / limit speed/bandwidth
> for DMZ "link"?

You can set the port speed to 10 Mbps or 100 Mbps.

> q3: i guess when 2nd 5505 initiate IPsec tunnel (site-to-site) that the 1st
> one wouldn't be aware of that (licence issues?) ?

Yes, the first 5505 is just passing the traffic.

> q4: all services that needs to be accessible from the internet behind 2nd
> 5505 would be accessible if configured only on 2nd 5505 ?

Yes, if the first one is configured for full access.
From: Dogg Child on 8 Jun 2010 09:06
Tnx for reply, my answers/questions are below.

--


....
:: Dogg.Child:::Honored.member.of.The.Wu-Tang.Clan ::

dogg[AltGr+V]nkc-sisak.hr
....


"Jyri Korhonen" <korhojy(a)POISSPAMMIThotmail.com> wrote in message
news:U2rPn.17427$if1.6176(a)uutiset.elisa.fi...
> "Dogg Child" <dogg[AltGr+V]@nkc-sisak.hr> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> excuse me at first if i don't explain this properly, i'll try...
>> I have one internet link, and two ASA5505's, and two "networks" that need
>> access from and to internet.
>> The main idea is that 1st 5505 would be configured with 3 interfaces -
>> In,Out, DMZ.
>> Through DMZ i would forward all traffic from one public ip (exmpl.
>> x.x.x.5) to 2nd 5505. Basically DMZ on 1st 5505 would be connected to Out
>> interface on 2nd 5505, and not filtering anything.
>> Out interf. on 1st 5505 would have other pub ip (exmpl. x.x.x.4).
>> Behind both 5505's i have different subnets that requiers some access
>> from and to the internet.
>>
>> q1: Would that kind of wiring and connecting work?
>
> Yes, I believe so. But I don't understand why you need the second 5505.

second 5505 is needed for other "project" and "routing + VPN's"

>
>> q2: if that would work, is it possible to configure / limit
>> speed/bandwidth for DMZ "link"?
>
> You can set the port speed to 10 Mbps or 100 Mbps.

Can i for example from 10Mbps internet link "give" only 2 Mbps to 2nd 5505?

>
>> q3: i guess when 2nd 5505 initiate IPsec tunnel (site-to-site) that the
>> 1st one wouldn't be aware of that (licence issues?) ?
>
> Yes, the first 5505 is just passing the traffic.

Great.

>
>> q4: all services that needs to be accessible from the internet behind 2nd
>> 5505 would be accessible if configured only on 2nd 5505 ?
>
> Yes, if the first one is configured for full access.

Full access, you mean that full access is enabled on DMZ "port" only. And
other "inside" ports are using firewall rules configured for them only.?


From: Morph on 8 Jun 2010 14:55
In the message <hulf94$5ac$1(a)ss408.t-com.hr> "Dogg Child"
<dogg[AltGr+V]@nkc-sisak.hr> wrote:

| Can i for example from 10Mbps internet link "give" only 2 Mbps to 2nd 5505?

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa72/configuration/guide/qos.html
From: Morph on 8 Jun 2010 14:56
In the message <5h4t065g1oq9la3e7s308chbb1apq9fbel(a)4ax.com> Morph wrote:

| In the message <hulf94$5ac$1(a)ss408.t-com.hr> "Dogg Child"
| <dogg[AltGr+V]@nkc-sisak.hr> wrote:
|
| | Can i for example from 10Mbps internet link "give" only 2 Mbps to 2nd 5505?
|
| http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa72/configuration/guide/qos.html

Traffic shaping must be applied to all outgoing traffic on a physical
interface or in the case of the ASA 5505, on a VLAN. You cannot
configure traffic shaping for specific types of traffic.
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Cisco 861W opinions?
Next: ASA 5505 behind ASA 5505