From: Buck Rogers on
Hello All,

I've a customer who is presently using the package mentioned in the
Subject Header. Currently there are 9 people in the office and
they're soon to have 14. The current configuration includes NAT, and
DHCPD enabled. Presently the only direct connection to the appliance
is a 16 port switch (to users), and a DSL modem (to outside).

As I understand it, the 10 user license allows for a maximum of 10
incoming VPN connections. However, I'm fuzzy on the max users
internally and the term concurrent sessions. The company has one
static IP address, and the appliance is providing the internal IP
addresses.

My question is...will the company need to upgrade to a 50 user package
just to get 4 more people connected? Or are they still good to go?

I'll be happy to provide further information to get the correct
answer.

Regards and thanks in advance for the much needed help,

Buck
From: Morph on
In the message <t21ti5tel6b92cbua4sd78nh4tvsem3tnu(a)4ax.com> Buck Rogers
wrote:

| Hello All,
|
| I've a customer who is presently using the package mentioned in the
| Subject Header. Currently there are 9 people in the office and
| they're soon to have 14. The current configuration includes NAT, and
| DHCPD enabled. Presently the only direct connection to the appliance
| is a 16 port switch (to users), and a DSL modem (to outside).
|
| As I understand it, the 10 user license allows for a maximum of 10
| incoming VPN connections. However, I'm fuzzy on the max users
| internally and the term concurrent sessions. The company has one
| static IP address, and the appliance is providing the internal IP
| addresses.
|
| My question is...will the company need to upgrade to a 50 user package
| just to get 4 more people connected? Or are they still good to go?

Yes it seems they will have to update to 50 users limit if they want
more then 10 people connecting to the internet.
http://www.tech21century.com/cisco-asa-5505-user-license-explained/