Prev: Is Milw0rm dead? No new POC's posted since last September
Next: ryr.exe--info please
From: Leythos on 19 Jan 2010 13:38
In article <da8e75bb-c4d1-4c8c-9b88-
107fccd9bfcb(a)j5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, pm771.am(a)gmail.com says...
> Which anti-virus tool is most robust and problem-free in Win '7 64-bit
> environment? It does not have to be free. I'm OK with paying
> reasonable subscription for trouble-free product that is kept up-to-
> date.
>

Using Avira on my W7U x64 machines without any issues - actually watched
it catch drive-by attacks from websites, something you won't see from
MSE.

--
You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little
voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that.
Trust yourself.
spam999free(a)rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
From: Eugene F. on 19 Jan 2010 20:26
> Anything wrong with MS Security Essentials?

Is it something that is already included with Win 7 or do I need to
get it separately?

==========================================================
On Jan 18, 10:13 am, "The Central Scrutinizer" <gci...(a)hotmail.com>
wrote:
> "Eugene F." <pm771...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:da8e75bb-c4d1-4c8c-9b88-107fccd9bfcb(a)j5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Our new home DELL laptop came with Windows 7 (64 bit) and McAfee.
> > While I'm OK with Norton 2009 and 2010, I'd rather avoid McAfee at
> > this point.
>
> > Which anti-virus tool is most robust and problem-free in Win '7 64-bit
> > environment? It does not have to be free.  I'm OK with paying
> > reasonable subscription for trouble-free product that is kept up-to-
> > date.
>
> Anything wrong with MS Security Essentials?

From: Beauregard T. Shagnasty on 19 Jan 2010 22:24
The Fakest of Fake Truth Impossible-To-Be-An-MVP wrote:

> .. instead you posts lies.

Well, there's a pot/kettle/black statement if there ever was one!

--
The Real Truth: http://www.google.com/search?q=pcbutts1+software+thief
*WARNING* Do NOT follow any advice given by the people listed below.
They do NOT have the expertise or knowledge to fix your issue. Do not
waste your time.
PCButtface1, The Not-Real Truth Not-an-MVP, fake-ms-mvp.org
From: Charlie on 19 Jan 2010 22:52
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:26:47 -0800 (PST), "Eugene F."
<pm771.am(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>> Anything wrong with MS Security Essentials?
>
>Is it something that is already included with Win 7 or do I need to
>get it separately?
>
>==========================================================
>On Jan 18, 10:13�am, "The Central Scrutinizer" <gci...(a)hotmail.com>
>wrote:
>> "Eugene F." <pm771...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:da8e75bb-c4d1-4c8c-9b88-107fccd9bfcb(a)j5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > Our new home DELL laptop came with Windows 7 (64 bit) and McAfee.
>> > While I'm OK with Norton 2009 and 2010, I'd rather avoid McAfee at
>> > this point.
>>
It is not built-in to Windows 7 because of anti-trust issues. It is FREE
for everyone at this link.
http://www.microsoft.com/security_essentials/default.aspx

>> > Which anti-virus tool is most robust and problem-free in Win '7 64-bit
>> > environment? It does not have to be free. �I'm OK with paying
>> > reasonable subscription for trouble-free product that is kept up-to-
>> > date.
>>
>> Anything wrong with MS Security Essentials?
From: Dustin Cook on 20 Jan 2010 01:20
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous(a)example.invalid> wrote in
news:hj5t0v$snk$1(a)news.eternal-september.org:

> The Fakest of Fake Truth Impossible-To-Be-An-MVP wrote:
>
>> .. instead you posts lies.
>
> Well, there's a pot/kettle/black statement if there ever was one!
>

I like your new signature. :)


--
"Is there anything in Guul Draz that doesn't suck the life out of you?"
- Tarsa, Sea Gate sell-sword.

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Is Milw0rm dead? No new POC's posted since last September
Next: ryr.exe--info please