Prev: alt.comp.freeware links at Tue Jun 29 21:20:01 2010
Next: Red Hat Still Doesn't Need Desktop Linux
From: Man-wai Chang on 29 Jun 2010 09:56
I can't quite remember...

Was there a change in the mbox format used by Mozilla Thunderbird to
store messages when moving from 1.x to 2.x?

--
@~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you!
/( _ )\ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.34
^ ^ 21:54:01 up 8 days 6:32 2 users load average: 1.01 1.03 1.00
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
From: Gary R. Schmidt on 29 Jun 2010 10:33
Man-wai Chang wrote:
> I can't quite remember...
>
> Was there a change in the mbox format used by Mozilla Thunderbird to
> store messages when moving from 1.x to 2.x?
>
No. Mbox format has been unchanged for decades.

There *may* have been a change in the index files, however, I can't recall.

Cheers,
Gary B-)
From: Man-wai Chang on 29 Jun 2010 10:37
>> Was there a change in the mbox format used by Mozilla Thunderbird to
>> store messages when moving from 1.x to 2.x?
>>
> No. Mbox format has been unchanged for decades.

I think so...

> There *may* have been a change in the index files, however, I can't recall.

I think the threaded view was based on the information in the message
header, right? Why would that 5 folders' indexes failed when all the
others worked? Puzzling....

Do you have time to see one of the 5 mbox files?

There is no sensitive stuff there, just messages about programming in
Visual Foxpro! :)

--
@~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you!
/( _ )\ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.34
^ ^ 22:34:01 up 8 days 7:12 2 users load average: 1.00 1.02 1.00
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
From: Gary R. Schmidt on 30 Jun 2010 08:27
Man-wai Chang wrote:
>>> Was there a change in the mbox format used by Mozilla Thunderbird to
>>> store messages when moving from 1.x to 2.x?
>>>
>> No. Mbox format has been unchanged for decades.
>
> I think so...
>
>> There *may* have been a change in the index files, however, I can't
>> recall.
>
> I think the threaded view was based on the information in the message
> header, right? Why would that 5 folders' indexes failed when all the
> others worked? Puzzling....
>
> Do you have time to see one of the 5 mbox files?
>
> There is no sensitive stuff there, just messages about programming in
> Visual Foxpro! :)
>
Sure. Zip 'em up and send 'em to this address, it's real.

Cheers,
Gary B-)
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: alt.comp.freeware links at Tue Jun 29 21:20:01 2010
Next: Red Hat Still Doesn't Need Desktop Linux