From: Gerhard Reithofer on
Hi,
I searched for Active TCL for Unix and could not find something on the
Activestate site. I found only free community versions Linux, Windows
and MAC.

Is this cancelled forever (also older versions)?

--
Gerhard Reithofer
Tech-EDV Support Forum - http://support.tech-edv.co.at
From: Larry W. Virden on
On May 13, 6:23 am, Gerhard Reithofer <gerhard.reitho...(a)tech-
edv.co.at> wrote:
> Hi,
> I searched for Active TCL for Unix and could not find something on the
> Activestate site. I found only free community versions Linux, Windows
> and MAC.
>
> Is this cancelled forever (also older versions)?
>

What do you mean when you say "Unix"? Earlier this year, ActiveState
announced that http://www.activestate.com/business_edition/ is
available for purchase for development on AIX, Solaris, and HP-UX.
Other than that, one has access to the sf.net CVS repositories for
almost everything in ActiveTcl if a free option is desired.
From: Gerhard Reithofer on
Hi Larry,

On Thu, 13 May 2010, Larry W. Virden wrote:

> On May 13, 6:23 am, Gerhard Reithofer <gerhard.reitho...(a)tech-
> edv.co.at> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I searched for Active TCL for Unix and could not find something on the
> > Activestate site. I found only free community versions Linux, Windows
> > and MAC.
> >
> > Is this cancelled forever (also older versions)?
>
> What do you mean when you say "Unix"? Earlier this year, ActiveState
> announced that http://www.activestate.com/business_edition/ is
> available for purchase for development on AIX, Solaris, and HP-UX.
> Other than that, one has access to the sf.net CVS repositories for
> almost everything in ActiveTcl if a free option is desired.

yes, I meant the systems you wrote.

As software developer I used for development usually newer versions.
As long as there were free versions available I had not to look at a
specific version because the companies could download always a new one.

I always proposed to use new versions and to buy support - e. g. for
security reasons among other things - but I did not really care about
that.
Now I cannot ignore this when working for the mentioned Unix versions.

I have to care (not taken compiling TCL into account),
that the customer either has the version I use
or he has to buy (or I have to buy for him) the business edition
or I have to develop for the version he has
or he has (or I have) to use another distribution.

Thank you very much.

--
Gerhard Reithofer
Tech-EDV Support Forum - http://support.tech-edv.co.at
From: Jeff Godfrey on
On 5/13/2010 11:49 AM, Gerhard Reithofer wrote:

> I have to care (not taken compiling TCL into account),
> that the customer either has the version I use
> or he has to buy (or I have to buy for him) the business edition
> or I have to develop for the version he has
> or he has (or I have) to use another distribution.

Gerhard,

Why not package your application as a StarPack or TclApp? That way,
your customer won't even have to install Tcl/Tk and you can always be
sure what build is being used by your code.

Jeff


From: Larry W. Virden on
On May 13, 3:02 pm, Jeff Godfrey <jeff_godf...(a)pobox.com> wrote:
>
> Why not package your application as a StarPack or TclApp?  That way,
> your customer won't even have to install Tcl/Tk and you can always be
> sure what build is being used by your code.
>
> Jeff

Jeff, a question about this route. The last version of the Tcl Dev Kit
that I got came with the wonderful development tools, but no ActiveTcl
- instead, there was a pointer to the current ActiveTcl distribution.
Now that the "legacy systems" ActiveTcl are a part of the business
license program, will a purchase of TDK come with their ActiveTcl
distributions?