From: Ken Maltby on 2 Dec 2009 01:56 I have a Mio P550 that seemed to die/lockup on me while sitting on a charger base. It would not boot, into the OS (WM5). Eventually I decided to flash a new ROM image, as that seemed to be the only way to get it working again. To make a long story short, I finally found a download package that included what I needed to get the Uboot low level bootloader to match the ROM image for WM6.1 (a translation of the french version of the OS) [v1.03 by Crashoverhead] that I could find, and install WM6.1 to have a working P550 again. I originally had the Oscar250/260AB_UT_R13 bootloader on the P550 but now have the Oscar250/260AB_UT_R12. So far I can't get ActiveSync 4.5 (or 4.2) USB Drivers to recognize the P550 as it is now. This is on my Windows XP Pro x64 SP2 System. Without ActiveSync installed, XP seems to recognize a "Mobile Device" when the USB cable to the P550 is attached, and throws up no error. (Not that, that means much, as I can't find it in Win Explorer or "My Computer" and can't make any use of the fact.) [ It does make me wonder if I could install ActiveSync, without it replacing the USB Drivers, if it would then work.] Oddly windows throws up an error saying that an "unknown" USB device is attached, when either ActiveSync version is installed. Even more odd because windows can recognize the P550, as a testbed when the P550 is in the bootloader mode. The ActiveSync Icon remains grayed out, and nothing I've tried can get it to recognize or connect to the P550. So, any ideas on how to get ActiveSync working with my P550 running under WM6.1? Failing that, does anyone know of a good substitute for ActiveSync? Luck; Ken
From: Beverly Howard on 2 Dec 2009 15:52 All the "drivers" do is to associate the device's USB id with Activesync. The likely reason you are having the problem is that the new id didn't exist when the driver file (WCEUSBSH.INF) was populated. Might see if mio has an updated file or try to find a newer ASync CD. If you find one, grab WCEUSBSH.CAT as well as that contains the "driver certification" codes for XP... if it's not there, you simply "accept" when it warns you. fwiw, this is not a new problem but it has not appeared for a long time. Beverly Howard
From: Ken Maltby on 3 Dec 2009 05:28 "Beverly Howard" <Bev(a)NoSpamBevHoward.com> wrote in message news:OD2CTF5cKHA.4724(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > All the "drivers" do is to associate the device's USB id with Activesync. > > The likely reason you are having the problem is that the new id didn't > exist when the driver file (WCEUSBSH.INF) was populated. > Hmm.... So perhaps if I have the P550 plugged in and recognized as a Mobile Device, then tried installing ActiveSync 4.5, the install might build an WCEUSBSH.INF with the proper ID entries? > Might see if mio has an updated file or try to find a newer ASync CD. If > you find one, grab WCEUSBSH.CAT as well as that contains the "driver > certification" codes for XP... if it's not there, you simply "accept" when > it warns you. > I have an old copy of the WCEUSBSH.CAT, how would it help with the ActiveSync 4.5 install ? Would having it in the same Dir as the install .msi be good enough, or do I need to recompile the .msi, somehow? Luck; Ken > fwiw, this is not a new problem but it has not appeared for a long time. > > Beverly Howard
From: Beverly Howard on 3 Dec 2009 18:47 >> the install might build an WCEUSBSH.INF with the proper ID entries? << No... you need to find a recent copy of WCEUSBSH.INF, right click that and select "install" If you can get one from MIO that supports the upgrade you performed, that would be the best solution. PNP requires that any USB connected device have information in the registry (which, in this case, comes from driver files such as the above) before it will allow any device to use a usb port. You posted that you upgraded the firmware on your device... I assume that doing so let the device with a new and different usb id which is transmitted on every usb connect. The dialog you posted that comes up on every connect seems to indicate that this is the problem. Beverly Howard
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Why publishers oppose self publishing Next: non-DRM ePub books |