From: Roger Pack on 6 Aug 2010 21:03 > * Regexp.union shortcut > > /Ruby\d/ | /test/i | "cheat" > # creates a Regexp similar to: > # /(Ruby\d|[tT][eE][sS][tT]|cheat)/ > What's your opinion about these methods? I like the regex one. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
From: yermej on 6 Aug 2010 23:01 On Aug 6, 2:41 pm, Jan Lelis <p...(a)janlelis.de> wrote: > Hi, I've collected some nice little additions to Ruby and put them in a > gem called zucker. I was going to give it a try, but when I installed it (sudo gem install zucker), I only ended up with the /var/lib/gems/1.8 directories and none of the /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/ directories. I'm running Linux Mint 9. $ gem -v 1.3.5 $ ruby -v ruby 1.8.7 (2010-01-10 patchlevel 249) [i486-linux]
From: Jan Lelis on 7 Aug 2010 18:28 Thank you all for your feedback :) Benoit Daloze wrote: > I extended a bit the concept to allow multiple syntax: > http://github.com/eregon/Classes/blob/master/to_proc.rb > I would not use any of these for serious code, however. I like the chaining idea ;) @yermej Looks like if something is wrong with your Rubygems installation. Did you install it from the repositories or from source? J-_-L
From: yermej on 7 Aug 2010 20:05 On Aug 7, 5:28 pm, Jan Lelis <p...(a)janlelis.de> wrote: > Thank you all for your feedback :) > > Benoit Daloze wrote: > > I extended a bit the concept to allow multiple syntax: > >http://github.com/eregon/Classes/blob/master/to_proc.rb > > I would not use any of these for serious code, however. > > I like the chaining idea ;) > > @yermej Looks like if something is wrong with your Rubygems > installation. Did you install it from the repositories or from source? > > J-_-L Yeah, looks like something is wrong with my machine. I've used gems in the past on this machine, but I must have broken something.
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Problem with return value Next: Failed to install 'rubynode' gem after Snow Leopard upgrade |