Prev: linux-next: build warning after merge of the scsi tree
Next: [PATCH v6 1/3] export __get_user_pages_fast() function
From: Paul Mundt on 3 Aug 2010 23:40 On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 04:59:26PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 13:03:25 +0530 > "Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar(a)ti.com> wrote: > > > > thought that those events simply aren't occurring, and that the patch > > > has no effect. Confused - please explain further. > > These events can come during the CPU hotplug(offline). Below is the > > complete patch. Also attaching it in case some email format screw > > up. > > > > ----------------------------------------------- > > >From b99271ce43cc82cda28447444004933d0f218ee3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar(a)ti.com> > > Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:58:22 +0530 > > Subject: [PATCH] console: flush delayed log messages from cpu-hotplug events > > > > When a secondary CPU is being brought up, it is not uncommon for > > printk() to be invoked when cpu_online(smp_processor_id()) == 0. The > > case that I witnessed personally was on MIPS: > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/30/4 > > > > If (can_use_console() == 0), printk() will spool its output to log_buf > > and it will be visible in "dmesg", but that output will NOT be echoed to > > the console until somebody calls release_console_sem() from a CPU that > > is online. Therefore, the boot time messages from the new CPU can get > > stuck in "limbo" for a long time, and might suddenly appear on the > > screen when a completely unrelated event (e.g. "eth0: link is down") > > occurs. > > > > This patch modifies the console code so that any pending messages are > > automatically flushed out to the console whenever a CPU hotplug > > operation completes successfully or aborts. > > This is true even when CPU is getting hot-plugged out(offline) so > > need to add additional hotplug events. > > > > The issue was seen on 2.6.34. > > > > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar(a)ti.com> > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee(a)gmail.com> > > An older version of this patch is present in linux-next, committed by > Paul Mundt, who wasn't cc'ed here(!). > > Paul, please update. Be aware that the version of the patch to which I > replied is also not the latest. > I just reviewed it, it went in through the MIPS tree if memory serves correctly, so Ralf (added to Cc) would have been the one that checked it in. I'll take a look at the thread though. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |