Prev: Rare math video
Next: roots to *any* polynomial
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 18 Jun 2010 15:00


Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(all else snipped)
>
> Now many of us were taught in schools (brainwashed) into thinking that
> gold or uranium was
> crafted only in some faraway supernova a long time ago and eventually
> became part of Earth's elements. In reality though, the gold or
> uranium that we find on Earth never came from
> any supernova, but was gradually built up from smaller atomic numbered
> elements, proton by proton via Dirac new-radioactivities such as
> cosmic rays. Now some may find this hard to believe, until most
> everyone learns that the Cosmos has Cosmic Gamma Ray Bursts that also
> comes from a Atom Totality Nucleus and some of these bursts can wipe
> out an entire
> galaxy. Yes, you heard me correctly. In past years some gamma ray
> bursts are the most
> powerful single events in the Cosmos, having more energy than an
> entire galaxy has
> energy.
>

Well, I want to qualify that thought of "more energy than an entire
galaxy"
More electromagnetic energy than an entire galaxy of its
electromagnetic energy.

--- quoting Wikipedia on a energetic gamma ray burst ---
GRB 080916C is a gamma-ray burst (GRB) that occurred on September 16,
2008 in the Carina constellation and detected by NASA's Fermi Gamma-
ray Space Telescope. It is the most powerful gamma-ray burst ever
recorded. The explosion had more power than 9,000 supernovae, and the
gas jets emitting the initial gamma rays moved at a minimum velocity
of 99.9999 percent the speed of light, making this blast the most
extreme recorded to date.[1][2]
--- end quoting ---

These powerful gamma ray bursts are true and undeniable. They exist.
What does not
exist are black-holes, Big Bang which cannot explain something like
GRB 080916C.

There is no debate, no argument as to the existence of these powerful
Gamma Ray Bursts.
And the only reasonable explanation is that the Cosmos has a powerful
Emitter to create
such a burst. That Emitter is a Nucleus of an Atom Totality. Black
holes are no emitters
of such a event. The Big Bang is no emitter except if you want to
count its initial explosion as
an emission.

So there is nothing in the physics of a Big Bang with black-holes to
account for a Cosmos
that has frequent and periodic Gamma Ray Bursts of such a huge
magnitude. The only
reasonable accounting for these huge bursts is a Nucleus of an Atom
Totality.

A Nucleus of an Atom Totality would account for the building of the
Universe via
Dirac new radioactivities of a constant spew of cosmic rays and cosmic
gamma ray bursts.
A Nucleus would also account for Solid Body Rotation of galaxies and
thus the 99% missing
mass since the Nucleus is the bulk of the mass of the Universe. No
scientist, with any
sort of reasoning or logic could accept a Big Bang with black holes
when they see
a Cosmic Gamma Ray Burst of that magnitude. The Universe is not driven
by gravity
with black holes swallowing up things, but rather, the Universe is
driven by an
emitter. A huge emitter such as a Nucleus that can routinely emit huge
gamma ray bursts.


Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Rare math video
Next: roots to *any* polynomial