Prev: LHC collider: There is ZERO SPACING between the protons??
Next: Chromatin remains found in meteorite ALH84001
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 18 Jun 2010 03:48
Now this topic of the cosmic abundance of chemical elements is going
to be competing for
two different chapters in this book, chapter 5 of Dirac's new
radioactivities and chapter
12, the cosmic abundance and distribution of chemical elements. It is
annoying for me
to have to sort and weigh whether a post is in one chapter or the
other, and I guess if
the editions of this book reach to edition 10 or 11, that I can begin
to fine tune even such
a daunting task or organization.

Having discussed the proportion of heavy water in Earth Oceans versus
in Comets, has
made me realize that the Cosmic abundance and distribution of the
chemical elements
is a proof of not only the Atom Totality theory but also a proof that
Dirac new
radioactivities is at work.

If you study the cosmic abundance of chemical elements, you know there
is a puzzle
as to why the lighter elements of lithium, beryllium and boron are so
rare, when they should
not be that rare.

--- quoting Wikipedia on lithium ---
The nuclei of lithium are relatively fragile: the two stable lithium
isotopes found in nature have lower binding energies per nucleon than
any other stable compound nuclides, save deuterium, and helium-3 (3He).
[1] Though very light in atomic weight, lithium is less common in the
solar system than 25 of the first 32 chemical elements.[2]
--- end quoting ---

If Dirac's new radioactivities is true of additive creation, then
there are barriers to the creation
or aufbau of these elements for a cosmic abundance.

Now in the Big Bang theory, the abundance and distribution of the
chemical elements hinges
on supernova, creating the elements and distributing them. But
supernova are rare and their
attempts of distribution would be a sloppy distribution to say the
least, and to
think they can be such a perfect creator and distributor of elements
is so farfetched that
these scientists should be ashamed in believing what they believe.

On the other hand, if you accept Dirac's new radioactivities, we
immediately see and can sense a cosmic uniform creation and
distribution of the chemical elements. And because
of additive creation, that the lighter elements would be almost
nonexistent in stars but rather
abundant in the planets that are near the stars. So that we have a
rarity of lithium, beryllium
and boron in stars but an abundance of them in the planets that
revolve around those
stars. The reason being is that Dirac additive creation has barriers
in massive astro bodies
like stars but not a barrier in lighter bodies like planets. So the
additive creation process
is different depending on the mass of the astro body. And we see this
in the Comets having
heavy water at 320ppm whereas Earth has heavy water at 160ppm.

Now other elements such as technetium at 43 and promethium at 61 are
virtually nonexistent
in the cosmos at large. Now the Big Bang with its supernova
explanation is again deaf, dumb
and silent about elements 43 and 61. But the Dirac new radioactivities
with additive creation
can explain this glitch of 43 and 61, by saying that the process of
additive creation, regardless
of the mass of the astro body, cannot build or aufbau 43 and 61 since
those are weak points
in the aufbau. But elements of thorium and uranium at 90 and 92 are
apparently overabundant
in the cosmos and that is explained easily by the additive-creation
that 90 and 92 are energy wells that attract the cosmic rays in aufbau
regardless of whether a massive star or a tiny planet.

So we see here a union or a link between the Dirac new radioactivities
with the abundance and
distribution of the chemical elements in the cosmos. In fact, I
envision that if someone were to
make a Cosmic mapping of every atom in the entire Universe that it
would match the mapping of what Jarrett and Juric are doing for the
galaxies and stars of the Universe. Both of them
were created from the same source of creation process-- Dirac's new
radioactivites additive form.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: LHC collider: There is ZERO SPACING between the protons??
Next: Chromatin remains found in meteorite ALH84001