Adriana Xenides Dead
in [Logic]
|
From: Jesse F. Hughes on 10 Jun 2010 07:24 Tim Little <tim(a)little-possums.net> writes: > On 2010-06-10, |-|ercules <radgray123(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> I have little time for you as you keep snipping the points you >> refute then repeating your exact same error. > > I'm not surprised that you have little time for me. By interacting > with me you run the risk of having to admit your errors to yourself, > and that would be abhorrent to you. Oh, please. This is a man who thinks that he's Truman, Adam, and maybe God. He thinks that he has special psychic powers, that some poor woman who is frightened by him is his perfect mate, that names indicate essence and that he is being tortured by sonic devices. No matter how perfect your argument, you won't force a person like this to admit that he's mistaken. -- Jesse F. Hughes "To your limited perspective it looks like nothing is happening, while already I have more impact on the math world with some posts here or on my blog than just about any other human being on the planet." JSH
From: |-|ercules on 11 Jun 2010 22:35 "Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote > Tim Little <tim(a)little-possums.net> writes: > >> On 2010-06-10, |-|ercules <radgray123(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>> I have little time for you as you keep snipping the points you >>> refute then repeating your exact same error. >> >> I'm not surprised that you have little time for me. By interacting >> with me you run the risk of having to admit your errors to yourself, >> and that would be abhorrent to you. > > Oh, please. > > This is a man who thinks that he's Truman, Adam, and maybe God. He > thinks that he has special psychic powers, that some poor woman who is > frightened by him is his perfect mate, that names indicate essence and > that he is being tortured by sonic devices. > > No matter how perfect your argument, you won't force a person like this > to admit that he's mistaken. > Being Adam is a longshot, but all the other claims fall into place given that, so essentially you are dismissing Adam and Eve could ever evolve at some point, unsubstantiated. Anyway a $50,000 prize skeptic company looks like they're going to give me a shot, so stay tuned, the mass ignorance won't last much longer. Herc
From: Jesse F. Hughes on 11 Jun 2010 23:17 "|-|ercules" <radgray123(a)yahoo.com> writes: > "Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote >> Tim Little <tim(a)little-possums.net> writes: >> >>> On 2010-06-10, |-|ercules <radgray123(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> I have little time for you as you keep snipping the points you >>>> refute then repeating your exact same error. >>> >>> I'm not surprised that you have little time for me. By interacting >>> with me you run the risk of having to admit your errors to >>> yourself, and that would be abhorrent to you. >> Oh, please. >> >> This is a man who thinks that he's Truman, Adam, and maybe God. He >> thinks that he has special psychic powers, that some poor woman who >> is frightened by him is his perfect mate, that names indicate >> essence and that he is being tortured by sonic devices. >> >> No matter how perfect your argument, you won't force a person like >> this to admit that he's mistaken. >> > > Being Adam is a longshot, but all the other claims fall into place > given that, so essentially you are dismissing Adam and Eve could ever > evolve at some point, unsubstantiated. Er, right. That's what I'm dismissing. > Anyway a $50,000 prize skeptic company looks like they're going to > give me a shot, so stay tuned, the mass ignorance won't last much > longer. Well, you can tell them that you picked this year's Stanley Cup winner, when there were eight teams in contention. That's probably not worth $50,000, but at least a buck or two. -- Jesse F. Hughes | "There's no other star but one star | and you want it to make light, | but it's not making light." | -- A blues tune by Quincy P. Hughes
From: Pol Lux on 11 Jun 2010 23:28 On Jun 7, 6:35 pm, "|-|ercules" <radgray...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote > > > > > > > "|-|ercules" <radgray...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > > >> "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote > >>> "|-|ercules" <radgray...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > > >>>>>> Given a set of labeled boxes containing numbers inside them, > >>>>>> can you possibly find a box containing all the label numbers of boxes > >>>>>> that don't contain their own label number? > > >>>> Have a go mate! > > >>> The answer is no, near as I can figure. > > >>> Now, if you also knew that, for each set of numbers, there is a box > >>> containing that set, then you'd have a paradox. Near as I can figure, > >>> you *don't* know that. > > >>> In set theory, on the other hand, we *do* know the analogous claim. > > >> So, no box ever containing the numbers of boxes not containing their own numbers > >> means higher infinities exist? > > > *Given* that every set of numbers is contained in some box, I guess > > so. > > > But I don't see how this analogy is supposed to make Cantor's theorem > > appear dubious. > > So, as many have put it, the holy grail of mathematics, the infinite paradise is based on > no box containing the numbers of boxes that don't contain their own number? > > Herc This thread is kind of like lunatics talking to each other. Fun grade: 4/10.
From: |-|ercules on 12 Jun 2010 00:02
"Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote > "|-|ercules" <radgray123(a)yahoo.com> writes: > >> "Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote >>> Tim Little <tim(a)little-possums.net> writes: >>> >>>> On 2010-06-10, |-|ercules <radgray123(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>> I have little time for you as you keep snipping the points you >>>>> refute then repeating your exact same error. >>>> >>>> I'm not surprised that you have little time for me. By interacting >>>> with me you run the risk of having to admit your errors to >>>> yourself, and that would be abhorrent to you. >>> Oh, please. >>> >>> This is a man who thinks that he's Truman, Adam, and maybe God. He >>> thinks that he has special psychic powers, that some poor woman who >>> is frightened by him is his perfect mate, that names indicate >>> essence and that he is being tortured by sonic devices. >>> >>> No matter how perfect your argument, you won't force a person like >>> this to admit that he's mistaken. >>> >> >> Being Adam is a longshot, but all the other claims fall into place >> given that, so essentially you are dismissing Adam and Eve could ever >> evolve at some point, unsubstantiated. > > Er, right. That's what I'm dismissing. > >> Anyway a $50,000 prize skeptic company looks like they're going to >> give me a shot, so stay tuned, the mass ignorance won't last much >> longer. > > Well, you can tell them that you picked this year's Stanley Cup winner, > when there were eight teams in contention. That's probably not worth > $50,000, but at least a buck or two. > Wow! I wasn't sure I could predict football games but there you go! "|-|ercules" <milliondollarfraud*gmail.com> writes: >> Nonetheless, will you have a go at the Stanley Cup winner or not? > > > Blackhawks How did you arrive at that answer? -- Jesse F. Hughes 2009-10 - Chicago Blackhawks What is it with this week? I won my defamation case for $250,000. A skeptic company will show my powers to the world. My football prediction worked. I finally disproved Cantor (wait for the formalization in ZFC) And yet I slept 3 nights in my car eating bread and smelling quite bad! Herc |