Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Albert Einstein's Theory of Relativity In Words of Four Letters or Less
Next: God, the ant, & Space_Time
From: spudnik on 24 Jun 2010 20:55 thanks for playing, Michael! > Pascal dyscovered (what he called) the plenum, > using glass tubes & mercury; he thought that > it was perfect though, and this seems to be the case > for Zero Point Energyists and the Aetherist -- he's here! thus&so: I recently barely skimmed an article in *Analog* by David Brin, who leverages his "training as an astronomer [I think]," to make the categorical error that the ability to predict the weather for a few days, and roughly for a year, means that our GCMs are just as accurate. really, "global" warming is a) computerized simulacra, and b) extremely selective reporting (most glaciers on Earth are supposed to be receding; they ain't -- see Fred Singer's old, retrospective metastudy .-) > The global warmers will claim that its 'only weather'. thus&so: it's a consensual cattle-call; the IPCC has continuously weeded-out any, who are not committed to the mainstream ideal, as far as I have read.... read Stephen Schneider's notorious admissions! > The science organizations just say yes, we support AGW theory... --le theoreme prochaine du Fermatttt! http://wlym.com
From: mpc755 on 24 Jun 2010 20:58 On Jun 24, 8:08 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jun 24, 4:55 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 24, 7:48 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Jun 24, 4:30 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 23, 5:37 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote: > > > > > > "colp" <c...(a)solder.ath.cx> wrote in message > > > > > >news:8ac7c694-eabd-4b93-9393-5e0bf73e8c48(a)i28g2000yqa.googlegroups..com... > > > > > On Jun 24, 5:51 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 23, 8:21 am, Mike Cavedon <mikecave...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Aether and matter are different states of the same material. > > > > > > > Just what we need. Another software goon (a QA engineer) trying to do > > > > > > physics. > > > > > > Can you say "ad hominem"? > > > > > ========================================= > > > > > Can you list all the pseudonyms you've used? > > > > > If this was intended for me then the answer is only this one. I posted > > > > while logged into another account by mistake. > > > > > "Newton puzzled over action-at-a-distance and developed the > > > > mathematics to describe and quantify the behaviour of matter > > > > and force. Since then we've made models of matter as protons > > > > and neutrons and electrons and forces as electrostatic, magnetic > > > > and gravitational. We still don't know how force acts at a distance > > > > or what the flubber is that protons and neutrons are made of. > > > > Then along comes E = mc^2 and it looks like matter is energy > > > > tied into knots." > > > > > There are theories out there which discuss matter as being knots of > > > > aether. Knots, to me, imply a 'pull'. The analogy is an atom in the > > > > middle of your car engine as you drive down the highway. In plenum > > > > theory, the nuclei in the middle of your car engine continually exists > > > > as different 'portions' of aether. > > > > > In Aether Displacement, nuclei are condensed aether which exist in and > > > > displace the neighboring aether. The nucleus of an atom displaces the > > > > aether which would otherwise exist where the nuclei does. > > > > > In terms of Aether Displacement, matter is condensed aether. > > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the neighboring aether > > > > and matter is energy. > > > > You do have aliases you know!!! > > > I think aether flow is the best theory. But it doesn't work for > > > gravity. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Yes. But who is going to prove it? > > Mitch Raemsch There are multiple examples in the original post which describe experimental evidence of Aether Displacement. Gravity is evidence of Aether Displacement. There are a couple of experiments described at the end of the original post which will provide further evidence of Aether Displacement.
From: mpc755 on 24 Jun 2010 21:04 On Jun 24, 8:55 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > thanks for playing, Michael! > Thanks for being the first to grasp A=Mc^2! Where A is aether and M is matter.
From: BURT on 24 Jun 2010 21:07 On Jun 24, 5:58 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 24, 8:08 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 24, 4:55 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jun 24, 7:48 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 24, 4:30 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Jun 23, 5:37 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote: > > > > > > > "colp" <c...(a)solder.ath.cx> wrote in message > > > > > > >news:8ac7c694-eabd-4b93-9393-5e0bf73e8c48(a)i28g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > On Jun 24, 5:51 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Jun 23, 8:21 am, Mike Cavedon <mikecave...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Aether and matter are different states of the same material.. > > > > > > > > Just what we need. Another software goon (a QA engineer) trying to do > > > > > > > physics. > > > > > > > Can you say "ad hominem"? > > > > > > ========================================= > > > > > > Can you list all the pseudonyms you've used? > > > > > > If this was intended for me then the answer is only this one. I posted > > > > > while logged into another account by mistake. > > > > > > "Newton puzzled over action-at-a-distance and developed the > > > > > mathematics to describe and quantify the behaviour of matter > > > > > and force. Since then we've made models of matter as protons > > > > > and neutrons and electrons and forces as electrostatic, magnetic > > > > > and gravitational. We still don't know how force acts at a distance > > > > > or what the flubber is that protons and neutrons are made of. > > > > > Then along comes E = mc^2 and it looks like matter is energy > > > > > tied into knots." > > > > > > There are theories out there which discuss matter as being knots of > > > > > aether. Knots, to me, imply a 'pull'. The analogy is an atom in the > > > > > middle of your car engine as you drive down the highway. In plenum > > > > > theory, the nuclei in the middle of your car engine continually exists > > > > > as different 'portions' of aether. > > > > > > In Aether Displacement, nuclei are condensed aether which exist in and > > > > > displace the neighboring aether. The nucleus of an atom displaces the > > > > > aether which would otherwise exist where the nuclei does. > > > > > > In terms of Aether Displacement, matter is condensed aether. > > > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > > > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > > > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > > > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > > > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > > > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the neighboring aether > > > > > and matter is energy. > > > > > You do have aliases you know!!! > > > > I think aether flow is the best theory. But it doesn't work for > > > > gravity. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Yes. But who is going to prove it? > > > Mitch Raemsch > > There are multiple examples in the original post which describe > experimental evidence of Aether Displacement. > > Gravity is evidence of Aether Displacement. > > There are a couple of experiments described at the end of the original > post which will provide further evidence of Aether Displacement.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - How does aether become gravity? Mitch Raemsch
From: mpc755 on 24 Jun 2010 21:20
On Jun 24, 9:07 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jun 24, 5:58 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 24, 8:08 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Jun 24, 4:55 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 24, 7:48 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Jun 24, 4:30 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 23, 5:37 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote: > > > > > > > > "colp" <c...(a)solder.ath.cx> wrote in message > > > > > > > >news:8ac7c694-eabd-4b93-9393-5e0bf73e8c48(a)i28g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > On Jun 24, 5:51 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Jun 23, 8:21 am, Mike Cavedon <mikecave...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Aether and matter are different states of the same material. > > > > > > > > > Just what we need. Another software goon (a QA engineer) trying to do > > > > > > > > physics. > > > > > > > > Can you say "ad hominem"? > > > > > > > ========================================= > > > > > > > Can you list all the pseudonyms you've used? > > > > > > > If this was intended for me then the answer is only this one. I posted > > > > > > while logged into another account by mistake. > > > > > > > "Newton puzzled over action-at-a-distance and developed the > > > > > > mathematics to describe and quantify the behaviour of matter > > > > > > and force. Since then we've made models of matter as protons > > > > > > and neutrons and electrons and forces as electrostatic, magnetic > > > > > > and gravitational. We still don't know how force acts at a distance > > > > > > or what the flubber is that protons and neutrons are made of. > > > > > > Then along comes E = mc^2 and it looks like matter is energy > > > > > > tied into knots." > > > > > > > There are theories out there which discuss matter as being knots of > > > > > > aether. Knots, to me, imply a 'pull'. The analogy is an atom in the > > > > > > middle of your car engine as you drive down the highway. In plenum > > > > > > theory, the nuclei in the middle of your car engine continually exists > > > > > > as different 'portions' of aether. > > > > > > > In Aether Displacement, nuclei are condensed aether which exist in and > > > > > > displace the neighboring aether. The nucleus of an atom displaces the > > > > > > aether which would otherwise exist where the nuclei does. > > > > > > > In terms of Aether Displacement, matter is condensed aether. > > > > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > > > > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > > > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > > > > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > > > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > > > > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > > > > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > > > > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the neighboring aether > > > > > > and matter is energy. > > > > > > You do have aliases you know!!! > > > > > I think aether flow is the best theory. But it doesn't work for > > > > > gravity. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Yes. But who is going to prove it? > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > There are multiple examples in the original post which describe > > experimental evidence of Aether Displacement. > > > Gravity is evidence of Aether Displacement. > > > There are a couple of experiments described at the end of the original > > post which will provide further evidence of Aether Displacement.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > How does aether become gravity? > > Mitch Raemsch Aether and matter are different states of the same material. The material is maether. Maether has mass. Aether and matter have mass. Aether is uncompressed maether and matter is compressed maether. Aether is displaced by matter. The aether is not at rest when displaced and 'displaces back'. The 'displacing back' is pressure exerted by displaced aether. Gravity is pressure exerted by displaced aether towards matter. The analogy is a bowling ball placed into a tank of water. When you take the bowling ball out of the tank of water is there a void where the bowling ball was? No, the water exerted pressure towards the bowling ball and fills-in where the bowling ball had been. Since the Earth exists of nuclei which displace the aether, the more correct analogy is to have a mesh container consisting of many marbles separated by springs. When you place the mesh container consisting of marbles into the tank of water the marbles displace the water. The water permeates where the marbles are separated by springs. The displaced water exerts pressure towards and throughout the mesh container. When you take the mesh container out of the water the water fills-in where the marbles had been. Aether is displaced by matter. The aether is not at rest when displaced and 'displaces back'. The 'displacing back' is pressure exerted by displaced aether. Gravity is pressure exerted by displaced aether towards matter. |