Aether Displacement
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: LHC versus cranks : 1-0
Next: Higgs security
From: mpc755 on 1 May 2010 17:05 Aether and matter are different states of the same material. Aether is displaced by matter. Displacement creates pressure. Gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter. Gravitation, the 'Dark Matter' Effect and the Fine Structure Constant http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0401047 "There we see the first arguments that indicate the logical necessity for quantum behaviour, at both the spatial level and at the matter level. There space is, at one of the lowest levels, a quantumfoam system undergoing ongoing classicalisation. That model suggest that gravity is caused by matter changing the processing rate of the informational system that manifests as space, and as a consequence space effectively flows towards matter. However this is not a flow of some form of matter through space, as previously considered in the aether models or in the random particulate Le Sage kinetic theory of gravity, rather the flow is an ongoing rearrangement of the quantum-foam patterns that form space, and indeed only have a geometrical description at a coarse-grained level. Then the flow in one region is relative only to the patterns in nearby regions, and not relative to some a priori background geometrical space" What is described as "space effectively flows towards matter" is the pressure exerted by the aether towards the matter. "Then the flow in one region is relative only to the patterns in nearby regions" is the pressure exerted by the aether in nearby regions displaced by the matter.
From: spudnik on 1 May 2010 22:33 ah, the flow of q-foam patterns in space, which he said are *not the same as* aether flow, but it's easy to see how anyone could interpret it, to be just such a thing ... if one believes in reifying the Copenhagen school, and Schroedinger's joke-cat <MEOW, I'm not/dying!> > "Then the flow in one region is relative only to the patterns in > nearby regions" is the pressure exerted by the aether in nearby > regions displaced by the matter. thus: there is either curvature or there isn't; this is the essence of Cusa's proof, that the circle cannot be "skwared" or rectilineated (that provides both neccesity & sufficiency). > Why would there necessarily be anything special happening to the > curvature at the Planck length, other than the notion that smaller and > smaller pieces of a spherical surface approximate a plane? thus: on the wayside, it is usually given as "p=mv," for historical reasons of "minding your Ps and Qs" (and, I don't think, it's the same "units" as a force). thus: one should read the acolyte of Hubbard at Shell; his two books on Peak Oil, really give a good precis of the whole business -- although they were published way too late, for him to say, I tol'y'so, as he did. the best theory of Earth processes is by a mechanical engineer, who worked at an America oil co. BP's mini-dysaster in the Gulf is certainly suspicsous, but keep in mind the quantification viz-a-vu the Exxxon spill by Puget Sound; the organic seeps in the Gulf are about one Valdez per annum -- with massive pumping. > Think Big -- Local Waste Treatment plants could turn sewage > into potable drinking water and potting soil. like, Bogart that poultice! thus: the original "KE" equation is known as Leibniz' *vis viva*; whereas others had thought it was just the first power of speed (i.e. Galileo, I think). > Experimentally, this is shown to apply to all forms of energy. thus: well, you made an assumption about the general tetrahedron, early in your proof, that only applies to a small class of them (the "orthocentric" ones .-) thus: now that you've read some of it; so? > Nice site, lyndon larouche & 21stcenturysciencetech.googolplexth.com. thus: he seems to be unaware of the neccesity in a"proof," of "neccesity AND sufficiency," as first stated by Leibniz (although having one or the other is, still, very good -- if actually so .-) > state of the aether, as determined by our inability to detect it. thus: so, you applied Coriolis' Force to General Relativity, and **** happened? > read more » thus: with only the "trivial" solutions on the curves o'Fermatttt, it sounds like a "necessary but insufficient" proof; PdF certainly could have done it. > I have been interested in the odd and even aspect of FLT , and > when Cn = 1. May I have your reference? thus: so, your coinage of pi(a,b) is the same as pi(b) - pi(a); now, can you say thr proof as a wordprolemmum? --Light: A History! http://wlym.takeTHEgoogolOUT.com
From: mpc755 on 2 May 2010 00:25 Aether and matter are different states of the same material. Aether is displaced by matter. Displacement creates pressure. Gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter. Gravitation, the 'Dark Matter' Effect and the Fine Structure Constant http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0401047 "There we see the first arguments that indicate the logical necessity for quantum behaviour, at both the spatial level and at the matter level. There space is, at one of the lowest levels, a quantumfoam system undergoing ongoing classicalisation. That model suggest that gravity is caused by matter changing the processing rate of the informational system that manifests as space, and as a consequence space effectively flows towards matter. However this is not a flow of some form of matter through space, as previously considered in the aether models or in the random particulate Le Sage kinetic theory of gravity, rather the flow is an ongoing rearrangement of the quantum-foam patterns that form space, and indeed only have a geometrical description at a coarse-grained level. Then the flow in one region is relative only to the patterns in nearby regions, and not relative to some a priori background geometrical space" What is described as "space effectively flows towards matter" is the pressure exerted by the aether towards the matter. "Then the flow in one region is relative only to the patterns in nearby regions" is the pressure exerted by the aether in nearby regions displaced by the matter.
From: mpc755 on 2 May 2010 00:29 On May 1, 10:33 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > ah, the flow of q-foam patterns in space, > which he said are *not the same as* aether flow, but > it's easy to see how anyone could interpret it, > to be just such a thing ... if one believes > in reifying the Copenhagen school, and > Schroedinger's joke-cat <MEOW, > I'm not/dying!> > The pressure exerted by the aether in nearby regions displaced by the matter is described, weakly, as "space effectively flows towards matter". Aether and matter are different states of the same material. Aether is displaced by matter. Displacement creates pressure. Gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter. Gravitation, the 'Dark Matter' Effect and the Fine Structure Constant http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0401047 "There we see the first arguments that indicate the logical necessity for quantum behaviour, at both the spatial level and at the matter level. There space is, at one of the lowest levels, a quantumfoam system undergoing ongoing classicalisation. That model suggest that gravity is caused by matter changing the processing rate of the informational system that manifests as space, and as a consequence space effectively flows towards matter. However this is not a flow of some form of matter through space, as previously considered in the aether models or in the random particulate Le Sage kinetic theory of gravity, rather the flow is an ongoing rearrangement of the quantum-foam patterns that form space, and indeed only have a geometrical description at a coarse-grained level. Then the flow in one region is relative only to the patterns in nearby regions, and not relative to some a priori background geometrical space" What is described as "space effectively flows towards matter" is the pressure exerted by the aether towards the matter. "Then the flow in one region is relative only to the patterns in nearby regions" is the pressure exerted by the aether in nearby regions displaced by the matter.
From: mpc755 on 2 May 2010 02:36
On May 1, 10:33 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > ah, the flow of q-foam patterns in space, > which he said are *not the same as* aether flow, but > it's easy to see how anyone could interpret it, > to be just such a thing ... if one believes > in reifying the Copenhagen school, and > Schroedinger's joke-cat <MEOW, > I'm not/dying!> > The pressure exerted by the aether in nearby regions towards the matter doing the displacing is described, weakly, as "space effectively flows towards matter". Aether and matter are different states of the same material. Aether is displaced by matter. Displacement creates pressure. Gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter. Gravitation, the 'Dark Matter' Effect and the Fine Structure Constant http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0401047 "There we see the first arguments that indicate the logical necessity for quantum behaviour, at both the spatial level and at the matter level. There space is, at one of the lowest levels, a quantumfoam system undergoing ongoing classicalisation. That model suggest that gravity is caused by matter changing the processing rate of the informational system that manifests as space, and as a consequence space effectively flows towards matter. However this is not a flow of some form of matter through space, as previously considered in the aether models or in the random particulate Le Sage kinetic theory of gravity, rather the flow is an ongoing rearrangement of the quantum-foam patterns that form space, and indeed only have a geometrical description at a coarse-grained level. Then the flow in one region is relative only to the patterns in nearby regions, and not relative to some a priori background geometrical space" What is described as "space effectively flows towards matter" is the pressure exerted by the aether towards the matter. "Then the flow in one region is relative only to the patterns in nearby regions" is the pressure exerted by the aether in nearby regions displaced by the matter. |