From: Shadow on 2 Feb 2010 18:31 I couldn't resist announcing the latest update from Eusing: Eusing Free Registry Cleaner 2.6 Platform: Windows 9x/Me/NT/2000/XP/2003/Vista/7 http://www.eusing.com/free_registry_cleaner/registry_cleaner.htm Eusing Free Registry Cleaner is a free registry repair software that allows you to safely clean and repair registry problems with a few simple mouse clicks. .......... Freeware, via ollydbg or email registration from site. :) (I use several registry cleaners, never had a problem with them) PS --- The sysinternals guy DOES recommend reg-cleaners. He wrote a more recent article praising them. Google it. []'s
From: Max Wachtel on 2 Feb 2010 19:57 On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:13:04 +0100, FredW wrote: > On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:31:14 -0200, Shadow <Sh(a)dow> wrote: > >>I couldn't resist announcing the latest update from Eusing: >> >> Eusing Free Registry Cleaner 2.6 >> >>Eusing Free Registry Cleaner is a free registry repair software that >>allows you to safely clean and repair registry problems with a few >>simple mouse clicks. .......... > > If you believe in fairy tales, this will certainly help. > :-)) > >>(I use several registry cleaners, never had a problem with them) >>PS --- The sysinternals guy DOES recommend reg-cleaners. He wrote a >>more recent article praising them. Google it. > > No, he does not! > That is another urban legend. > :-P > > . registry cleaners only remove a very small number of unused keys, > which won't help performance when you consider the hundreds of thousands > of keys in the registry. > > See "Cleaning the Registry Improves Performance" > http://lifehacker.com/5033518/debunking-common-windows-performance-tweaking-myths > > ;-) +1 -- This post was created using Dialog Virus Removal Instructions http://sites.google.com/site/keepingwindowsclean/home Max's Favorite Freeware http://sites.google.com/site/keepingwindowsclean/freeware
From: jzk on 3 Feb 2010 08:37 On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:13:04 +0100, FredW <fredw(a)blackholespam.net> wrote: >On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:31:14 -0200, Shadow <Sh(a)dow> wrote: > >>I couldn't resist announcing the latest update from Eusing: >> >> Eusing Free Registry Cleaner 2.6 >> >>Eusing Free Registry Cleaner is a free registry repair software that >>allows you to safely clean and repair registry problems with a few >>simple mouse clicks. .......... > >If you believe in fairy tales, this will certainly help. > :-)) > > >>(I use several registry cleaners, never had a problem with them) >>PS --- The sysinternals guy DOES recommend reg-cleaners. He wrote a >>more recent article praising them. Google it. > >No, he does not! >That is another urban legend. > :-P > > >. registry cleaners only remove a very small number of unused keys, >which won't help performance when you consider the hundreds of thousands >of keys in the registry. > >See "Cleaning the Registry Improves Performance" >http://lifehacker.com/5033518/debunking-common-windows-performance-tweaking-myths > > ;-) http://www.whatthetech.com/2007/11/25/do-i-need-a-registry-cleaner/ OK, so is it safe to use a registry cleaner? Or, are they a no-no? Thank you. Note: This question comes from our forums, and the response below is used with permission of the forum member (Bill Castner � MS MVP). Mark Russinovich (Author of the �Bible�, Windows Internals, co-founder of Winternals and Sysinternals, and since both companies were bought by Microsoft, now a senior Microsoft employee) was asked: Hi Mark, do you really think that Registry junk left by uninstalled programs could severely slow down the computer? I would like to �hear� your opinion. His reply fairly captures my own view (quoting Mark Russinovich): No, even if the registry was massively bloated there would be little impact on the performance of anything other than exhaustive searches (ed. of the registry itself). On Win2K Terminal Server systems, however, there is a limit on the total amount of Registry data that can be loaded and so large profile hives can limit the number of users that can be logged on simultaneously. I haven�t and never will implement a Registry cleaner since it�s of little practical use on anything other than Win2K terminal servers and developing one that�s both safe and effective requires a huge amount of application-specific knowledge.
From: Oldphart on 3 Feb 2010 15:09 On 2/3/2010 7:37 AM, jzk(a)ewq23.com wrote: > On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:13:04 +0100, FredW<fredw(a)blackholespam.net> > wrote: > >> On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:31:14 -0200, Shadow<Sh(a)dow> wrote: >> >>> I couldn't resist announcing the latest update from Eusing: >>> >>> Eusing Free Registry Cleaner 2.6 >>> >>> Eusing Free Registry Cleaner is a free registry repair software that >>> allows you to safely clean and repair registry problems with a few >>> simple mouse clicks. .......... >> >> If you believe in fairy tales, this will certainly help. >> :-)) >> >> >>> (I use several registry cleaners, never had a problem with them) >>> PS --- The sysinternals guy DOES recommend reg-cleaners. He wrote a >>> more recent article praising them. Google it. >> >> No, he does not! >> That is another urban legend. >> :-P >> >> >> . registry cleaners only remove a very small number of unused keys, >> which won't help performance when you consider the hundreds of thousands >> of keys in the registry. >> >> See "Cleaning the Registry Improves Performance" >> http://lifehacker.com/5033518/debunking-common-windows-performance-tweaking-myths >> >> ;-) > > http://www.whatthetech.com/2007/11/25/do-i-need-a-registry-cleaner/ > > OK, so is it safe to use a registry cleaner? Or, are they a no-no? > Thank you. > > Note: This question comes from our forums, and the response below is > used with permission of the forum member (Bill Castner � MS MVP). > > Mark Russinovich (Author of the �Bible�, Windows Internals, co-founder > of Winternals and Sysinternals, and since both companies were bought > by Microsoft, now a senior Microsoft employee) was asked: > > Hi Mark, do you really think that Registry junk left by > uninstalled programs could severely slow down the computer? I would > like to �hear� your opinion. > > His reply fairly captures my own view (quoting Mark Russinovich): > > No, even if the registry was massively bloated there would be > little impact on the performance of anything other than exhaustive > searches (ed. of the registry itself). > On Win2K Terminal Server systems, however, there is a limit on the > total amount of Registry data that can be loaded and so large profile > hives can limit the number of users that can be logged on > simultaneously. > I haven�t and never will implement a Registry cleaner since it�s > of little practical use on anything other than Win2K terminal servers > and developing one that�s both safe and effective requires a huge > amount of application-specific knowledge. +1 Thank you for the quote from Mark.
From: Hank Scorpio on 4 Feb 2010 07:39 Possible a naive question, but here goes: registry cleaners, it seems, don't do anything useful or significant; that seems to be the consensus. But most tech writers also seem to agree that from time to time a reinstall of Windows is a good thing. I'd assumed that was because such a reinstall would free your computer of accumulated detritus. If that detritus isn't in the registry, where is it and can it be got rid of other than by reinstalling Windows? Or is my assumption wrong? Thanks in advance.
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: alt.comp.freeware links at Tue Feb 2 21:20:02 2010 Next: CD burning software for Win98 SE |